A Foucauldian Critique of Scientific Naturalism: “Docile Minds”

Giladi, Paul

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to articulate a Foucauldian critique of scientific naturalism as well as a Foucauldian critique of the nomothetic framework underlying the Placement Problem. My Foucauldian post-structuralist critique of scientific naturalism questions the relations between our society’s imbrication of economic-political power structures and knowledge in a way that also effects some constructive critical alignment between Foucault and Habermas, helping to undermine the traditional view of their respective social critiques as incompatible. First, I will outline a brief genealogical backstory for the rise of scientific naturalism, and I will then reconstruct the Placement Problem. In the second part of the paper, I introduce Foucault’s notion of pouvoir-savoir (“power-knowledge”), namely his account of the interconnection between power and knowledge. I then go on to articulate the Foucauldian critique of scientific naturalism by arguing that the levelling nature of nomothetic rationality and its conservative naturalistic vocabulary involves regulative discourse: anything that resists placeability/locatability is labelled “odd”. By being thus visibly marked, “odd” phenomena become “queer” phenomena, which then become “problematic” phenomena. They are, thereby, construed in need of discipline (and even punishment). Understood in this Foucauldian way, scientific naturalist disciplinarity produces subjected and practised minds, “docile” minds.

Citation

Giladi, P. (2020). A Foucauldian Critique of Scientific Naturalism: “Docile Minds”. Critical Horizons, 21(3), 264-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2020.1790754

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jul 1, 2020
• Publication Date: Jul 1, 2020
• Deposit Date: Sep 8, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 8, 2023
• Journal: Critical Horizons
• Print ISSN: 1440-9917
• Electronic ISSN: 1568-5160
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 264-286
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2020.1790754
• Keywords: Foucault; power-knowledge; scientific naturalism; disciplinary power; critical theory; Habermas