DR Karabekir Akkoyunlu ka54@soas.ac.uk
Lecturer in Politics of the Middle East
Blood gambit: how autocratizing populists fuel ethnic conflict to reverse election setbacks – evidence from Turkey and Israel
Akkoyunlu, Karabekir; Sarfati, Yusuf
Authors
Yusuf Sarfati
Abstract
Through a comparative study of Turkey and Israel, this article highlights a specific strategy that autocratizing populist incumbents in ethnically divided societies utilize when they face election setbacks. A “blood gambit” entails fomenting violent conflict to keep the opposition divided along identitarian cleavages, while creating a rally-around-the-flag effect to help the incumbent win a renewed election. After failing to secure a parliamentary majority in June 2015, Erdoğan ended the Kurdish peace process and engineered repeat elections amidst heightened nationalist fervour and renewed conflict with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). These elections gave the Justice and Development Party (AKP) a majority and marked the beginning of its alliance with the ultranationalists. Following Israel’s March 2021 elections, Netanyahu increased state repression of Palestinians, which triggered interethnic violence and renewed confrontation with Hamas. The violence threw a wrench into coalition-building efforts between ideologically and ethnically diverse opposition parties. The comparison of Israel and Turkey as two countries with different majority religions, ethnic compositions and socioeconomic levels shows that “blood gambit” is not a parochial strategy. Our analysis also demonstrates that the outcomes of these strategies are shaped by differing institutional and political contexts, in particular, the extent of executive aggrandizement and the level of party fragmentation.
Citation
Akkoyunlu, K., & Sarfati, Y. (2025). Blood gambit: how autocratizing populists fuel ethnic conflict to reverse election setbacks – evidence from Turkey and Israel. Democratization, 32(2), 538-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2381686
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 14, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 5, 2024 |
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Aug 18, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 18, 2024 |
Journal | Democratization |
Print ISSN | 1351-0347 |
Electronic ISSN | 1743-890X |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 32 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 538-560 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2381686 |
Keywords | populism, autocratization, populist toolkit, ethnic conflict, political cleavage, executive aggrandizement, party fragmentation, opposition coordination, Turkey, Israel |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2024.2381686 |
Files
Blood gambit how autocratizing populists fuel ethnic conflict to reverse election setbacks evidence from Turkey and Israel.pdf
(1000 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Limits of autocratisation: actors and institutions of democratic resistance and opposition
(2025)
Journal Article
The Five Phases of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the AKP
(2021)
Journal Article
Sessiz devrimin gürültülü sonu: Brezilya İşçi Partisi’nin yükselişi ve düşüşü
(2021)
Book Chapter
Kemalism and the Republican People’s Party (CHP)
(2019)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search