Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Enclosing in God’s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality, and Accumulation in John Locke’s Theory of Property

Ince, Onur Ulas

Enclosing in God’s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality, and Accumulation in John Locke’s Theory of Property Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

John Locke's theory of property has been the subject of sustained contention between two major perspectives: a socioeconomic perspective, which conceives Locke's thought as an expression of the rising bourgeois sensibility and a defense of the nascent capitalist relations, and a theological perspective, which prioritizes his moral worldview grounded in the Christian natural law tradition. This essay argues that a closer analysis of Locke's theory of money in the Second Treatise can provide an alternative to this binary. It maintains that the notion of money comprises a conceptual area of indeterminacy in which the theological universals of the natural law and the historical fact of capital accumulation shade into each other. More specifically, the ambiguity of the status of money enables Locke to navigate an antinomy within the natural law such that he establishes a relation of necessity between the divine telos and accumulative practices.

Citation

Ince, O. U. (2011). Enclosing in God’s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality, and Accumulation in John Locke’s Theory of Property. Review of Politics, 73(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000859

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 11, 2010
Publication Date Feb 8, 2011
Deposit Date Jan 10, 2022
Publicly Available Date Jan 10, 2022
Journal The Review of Politics
Print ISSN 0034-6705
Electronic ISSN 1748-6858
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 73
Issue 1
Pages 29-54
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000859

Files

Enclosing in God's Name, Accumulating for Mankind, final version (Onur Ulas Ince).pdf (407 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in The Review of Politics, 73 (1) 2011. pp. 29-54 published by Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000859 This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © University of Notre Dame 2011





You might also like



Downloadable Citations