Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Protected Status, Sacred Sites, Black Holes and Human Agents: System, Sanctuary and Terrain Complexity

Innes, Michael A.

Authors

Michael A. Innes



Abstract

The rhetoric following 11 September 2001 was full of talk of operations and battles that would be fought out of the public view, in an effort to prepare voting publics for a conflict of indeterminate scope, duration, and indeed, of place. Locational issues were quickly made central to the new war. ‘Sanctuaries’, ‘safe havens’, ‘operating environments’, ‘enabling environments’: these were the buzzwords for the long war. They were not new terms of reference, however. Conceptually, sanctuary implies a complex terrain composed of numerous paradigms, correlates, and characteristics. There is also a long and rich history of sanctuary concepts and practices, the lessons of which suggest that perhaps it is more appropriate to think of the issues not in terms of static, grid-referenced points on a map, but as systemic gaps, cracks, elisions, or voids – or perhaps as a series of evolving perspectives, processes and conditions.

Citation

Innes, M. A. (2008). Protected Status, Sacred Sites, Black Holes and Human Agents: System, Sanctuary and Terrain Complexity. Civil Wars, 10(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240701835417

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 1, 2007
Online Publication Date Jul 2, 2008
Publication Date Jan 1, 2008
Deposit Date Nov 15, 2019
Journal Civil Wars
Print ISSN 1369-8249
Electronic ISSN 1743-968X
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 1
Pages 1-5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240701835417