Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality

Hill, Nathan W.; Gawne, Lauren

The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality Thumbnail


Authors

Lauren Gawne



Contributors

Lauren Gawne lg21@soas.ac.uk
Editor

Citation

Hill, N. W., & Gawne, L. (2017). The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. In L. Gawne, & N. W. Hill (Eds.), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages (1-38). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-001

Acceptance Date Sep 1, 2016
Publication Date Apr 1, 2017
Deposit Date Mar 29, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2017
Publisher De Gruyter
Pages 1-38
Book Title Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages
ISBN 9783110460186
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-001
Publisher URL https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/467693
Additional Information References : Agha, Asif. 1993. Structural form and utterance context in Lhasa Tibetan: grammar and indexicality in a non-configurational language. New York: Peter Lang. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 435-85. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 1-50. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239–277. Bailey, T. Grahame. 1920. Linguistic Studies from the Himalayas. London: Royal Asiatic Society. Bartee, Ellen. 1996. Deixis and spatiotemporal relations in Lhasa Tibetan. Arlington: The University of Texas MA thesis. Bartee, Ellen. 2011. The role of animacy in the verbal morphology of Dongwang Tibetan. In Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler (eds.), Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, 133-182. Leiden: Brill. Bashir, Elena. 2010. Traces of mirativity in Shina. Himalayan Linguistics 9(2). 1–55. Beckwith, Christopher I. 1992. Deictic class marking in Tibetan and Burmese. In M. Ratliff and E. Schiller, eds. Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 1-14. Tempe: Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies. Bell, Charles. 1905. Manual of Colloquial Tibetan. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press. Bendix, Edward. 1974. Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3.1, 42-59. Bendix, Edward. 1992. The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: interactional potential of evidential categories in Newari. In Jane Hill and Judith Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 226-247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bhat, D. N. S. 1999. The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bickel, Balthazar and Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 169-240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Revised second edition). Bielmeier, Roland. 1985. Das Märchen von Prinzen Čobzaṅ. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Bielmeier, Roland. 2000. Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2). 79–125. Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction. In F. Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, 5-83. Part i. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution. Byrne, St. Quentin. 1909. A Colloquial Grammar of the Bhutanese Language. Allahabad: Pioneer Press. Causemann, Margret (1989). Dialekt und Erzählungen der Nangchenpas. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Chang, Kun and Betty Shefts. 1964. A Manual of Spoken Tibetan (Lhasa Dialect). Seattle: University of Washington Press. Chang, Kun & Betty Chang. 1984. The certainty hierarchy among Spoken Tibetan verbs of being. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 55. 603-635. Chirkova, Katia 2008. 白马语示证范畴及其与藏语方言的比较 báimǎyǔ shìzhèng fànchóu jí qí yǔ Zàngyǔ fāngyán de bǐjiào [Evidentials in Baima and Tibetan dialects compared] 民族语文 Mínzú yǔwén 3. 36-43. Chonjore, Tsetan. 2003. Colloquial Tibetan: a textbook of the Lhasa dialect with reference grammar and exercises. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives. Comrie, Bernard, Haspelmath, Martin, & Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. Leipzig glossing rules. http: //www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php Retrieved 2015-06-07 Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2000. Why `first/non-first person' is not grammaticalized mirativity. Paper read at Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002a. Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3). 611-627. Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002c. Conjunct/disjunct systems in Barbacoan languages. In Jeanie Castillo (ed.), Proceedings from the fourth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages, 3-12. (Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 11). Santa Barbara: UCSB Department of Linguistics. Dahl, Östen. 2000. Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7(1). 37-77. Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014a. A grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University dissertation. Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014b. Volition and control in Wǎdū Pǔmǐ. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 75–103. DeLancey, Scott. 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 65-72. DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 203-213. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp. DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 289-321. DeLancey, Scott. 1992. The historical origin of the conjunct-disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 289-321. DeLancey, Scott 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33-52. DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369-382. DeLancey, Scott. 2003. Lhasa Tibetan. In Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 255-269. London: Routledge. Delancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16 (3). 529–564. DeLancey, Scott. 2015. The Historical Dynamics of Morphological Complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13(2), 60-79. Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Desjarlais, Robert R. 1992. Body and emotion: the aesthetics of illness and healing in the Nepal Himalayas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2). 379-421. Dickinson, Connie. 2011. Grammaticalizing the Knower in Tsafiki. In LSA workshop on conjunct/disjunct alignment. Boulder, Colorado: July 13-14. van Driem, George. 1993. The Newar verb in Tibeto-Burman perspective. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 26. 23-43. van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Research CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. van Driem, George. 2015. Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language: A language of the central Bhutan highlands. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 6. 1-77. Ebihara Shiho. 2011. Amdo Tibetan. In Yasuhiro Yamakoshi (ed.), Grammatical Sketches from the Field, 41-78. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Floyd, Simeon, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.). forthcoming. Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Francke, August Hermann. 1901. A Sketch of Ladakhi Grammar. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal (Part 1-History, Literature, etc.) 70(1), extra No. 2. 1-63. Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation. Gawne, Lauren. 2013a. Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne dissertation. Gawne, Lauren. 2013b. Notes on the relationship between Yolmo and Kagate. Himalayan Linguistics 12(2). 1-27. Gawne, Lauren. 2014. Evidentiality in Lamjung Yolmo. Journal of the South East Asian Linguistics Society 7. 76-96. Goldstein, Melvyn C. and Nawang Nornang. 1970. Modern spoken Tibetan: Lhasa dialect. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Grunow-Hårsta, K., 2007. Evidentiality and Mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 151-194. Hagège, Claude. 1982. La structure des langues, Que sais-je? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Hale, Austin. 1971. Person markers: conjunct and disjunct forms. Topics in Newari Grammar l. 1-12. SIL. Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In R. L. Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics, Vol. 7, 95-106. Canberra: Australian National University. Hale, Austin and Kedār P. Shrestha. 2006. Newār (Nepāl Bhāsā). Munich: Lincom Europa. Haller, Felix (2000). Dialekt und Erzählungen von Shigatse. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Haller, Felix (2004). Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen: sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialektes aus Nord-Amdo. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Hargreaves, David. 2003. Kathmandu Newar (Nepal Bhāśā). In Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 371-384. London: Routledge. Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5. 1-48. Hari, Anna Maria. 2010. Yohlmo Sketch Grammar. Kathmandu: Ekta books. Henderson, Vincent C. 1903. Tibetan manual. Calcutta: Inspector General of Chinese imperial maritime customs. Hermann, Silke. 1989. Erzählungen und Dialekt von Diṅri. Bonn: VGH wissenschaftsverlag. Hill, Nathan W. 2012. 'Mirativity' does not exist: ḥdug in 'Lhasa' Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389-433. Hill, Nathan W. 2013a. Contextual semantics of ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan evidentials. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(3). 47-54. Hill, Nathan W. 2013b. ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1-16. Hock, Hans Henrich. 2012. “Sanskrit and Pāṇini–Core and Periphery” Saṃskṛtavimarśaḥ 6: 85-102. Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 1992. Semantic peculiarities of Tibetan verbs of being. In S. Luksaneeyanawin (ed.), Pan-Asiatic Linguistics, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Vol. III. 1151-1162. Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 1993. Evidentials in Tibetan: A dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation. Hoshi Izumi (星泉). 2010. 14 世紀チベット語文献『王統明示鏡』における存在動詞. [Existential verbs in the Rgyal rabs gsal ba'i me long, a 14th century Tibetan narrative]. 東京大学言語学論集 Tokyo University Linguistic Papers 29(3). 29-68. Hoshi Michiyo (星 実千代). 1988. 現代チベット語文法（ラサ方言）. Gendai Chibetto-go bunpō (Rasahōgen). [Modern Tibetan grammar (Lhasa Dialect)]. Tokyo: ユネスコ東アジア文化研究センター Yunesuko Higashi Ajia Bunka Kenkyū Sentā. Huber, Brigitte. 2005. The Tibetan dialect of Lende (Kyirong). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011a. A grammar of Kurtöp. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation. Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011b. Mirativity in Kurtöp. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4(1). 43-60. Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2014. On the category of speaker expectation of interlocutor knowledge in Kurtöp. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 201-214. Jones, Eunice. 2009. Evidentiality and Mirativity in Balti. London: SOAS, University of London MA thesis. Kelly, Barbara F. 2004. A grammar of Sherpa. In C. Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 232-440. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Kitamura Hajime. 1977. Tibetan (Lhasa dialect). Tokyo: Ajia Afurika gengo bunka kenkyūjo. Koshal, Sanyukta. 1979. Ladakhi Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Knuchel, Dominique. 2015. A comparative study of egophoric marking: Investigating its relation to person and epistemic marking in three language families. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet MA thesis. Kretschmar, Monika. 1986. Erzählungen und Dialekt der Drokpas aus Südwest-Tibet. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Kretschmar, Monika. 1995. Erzählungen und Dialekt aus Südmustang. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Lidz, Liberty A. 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). Austin: University of Texas dissertation. Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A Grammar of Oksapmin. Melbourne: University of Melbourne dissertation. Norman, Rebecca. 2001. Getting Started in Ladakhi. (2nd edition). Leh: Melong Publications. Oisel, Guillaume. 2013. Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du Tibétain Littéraire. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 dissertation. Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 29-45. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp. Post, Mark W. 2007. A Grammar of Galo. PhD Dissertation. Melbourne: La Trobe University dissertation. Post, Mark W. 2013. Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In T. Thornes, E. Andvik, G. Hyslop & J. Jansen (eds.), Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation, 107-130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Rangan, K. 1979. Purik Grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. Read, Alfred F. C. 1934. Balti Grammar. London: Royal Asiatic Society. de Roerich, George. 1958. Le parler de l’Amdo: étude d’un dialecte archaïque du Tibet. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente. Roerich, George and Lopsang Phuntshok. 1957. Textbook of colloquial Tibetan: dialect of central Tibet. Calcutta: Govt. of West Bengal, Education Dept., Education Bureau. Róna-Tas, András. 1985. Wiener Vorlesungen zur Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte Tibets. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien. Rule, W. M. 1977. A comparative study of the Foe, Huli and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney. San Roque, Lila. 2008. An introduction to Duna grammar. Canberre: The Australian National University dissertation. San Roque, Lila. 2015. Using you to get to me: Addressee perspective and speaker stance in Duna evidential marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 68(2): 187–210. San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, & Norcliffe, Elisabeth. (in press). Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua. (online with the publisher in 2014) San Roque, Lila & Robin Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1). 111-167. Sandberg, Graham. 1894. Hand-book of colloquial Tibetan. A practical guide to the language of Central Tibet. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and co. Sandberg, Graham. 1888. Manual of the Sikkim Bhutia Language or Dénjong Ké. Calcutta: Oxford Mission Press. Sandberg, Graham. 1895. Manual of the Sikkim Bhutia Language or Dénjong Ké (second and enlarged edition). London: Archibald Constable & Co. Schwieger, Peter. 1989. Tibetisches Erzählgut aus Brag-g.yab: Texte mit Übersetzungen, grammatischem Abriss und Glossar. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Schwieger, Peter. 2002. Zur Funktion der verbalen Kongruenz im Lhasa-Tibetischen. In D. Dimitrov, U. Roesler, and R. Steiner (eds.), 175-184. Sikhisamuccayah: Indian and Tibetan Studies. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien. Schöttelndreyer, Burkhard. 1980. Person Markers in Sherpa. In S. A. Wurm (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No.7, 125-130. Canberra: The Australian National University. Shao, Mingyuan (邵明園). 2014. 安多藏语阿柔话的示证范畴 Evidentiality in A-rig Dialect of Amdo Tibetan. Nankai: Nankai University dissertation. Sharma, D. D. 2004. Tribal Languages of Ladakh. Part III. A Descriptive Grammar of Purki and Balti. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. Sresthacharya, Iswaranand, Jagan Nath Maskey, and Austin Hale (1971). Conversational Newari. Kathmandu: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Institute for Nepal Studies, Tribhuvan University. Sresthacarya, Iswaranda. 1976. Some types of reduplication in the Newari verb phrase. Contributions to Nepalese Studies 3(1). 117-127. Stoddard, Heather. 1985. Le mendiant de l'Amdo. Paris: Société d'ethnographie. Strahm, Esther. 1975. Clause Patterns in Jirel. In Austin Hale (ed.), Collected Papers on Sherpa, Jirel, 73-146. Kirtipur: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63(4). 143-188. Sung, Kuo-ming and Lha Byams Rgyal. 2005. Colloquial Amdo Tibetan: A Complete Course for Adult English Speakers. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (武内紹人). 1978. 現代チベット語における文の構造. Gendai Chibetto-go ni okeru bun no kōzō. Kyoto: Kyoto University MA thesis. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (武内紹人). 1990. チベット語の述部における助動詞の機能とその発達過程 Chibetto-go no jutsubu ni okeru jodōshi no kinō to sono hattatsu katei / The semantic Function of Auxiliary verbs in Tibetan and their historical development. In Osamu Sakiyama and Akihiro Sato (eds.), Asian Languages and General Linguistics, 6-16. Tokyo: Sanseido. Takeuchi, Tsuguhito (武内紹人). 2014. The function of auxiliary verbs in Tibetan predicates and their historical development. Revue d'Etudes Tibétaines 31. 401-415. (Translation of Takeuchi 1990). Tournadre, Nicolas. 1992. La déixis en tibétain: quelques faits remarquables. In Morel M.-A. et Danon-Boileau L. (ed.), La Deixis, 197–208. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Tournadre, Nicolas. 1994. Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de langues 3. 149-158. Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996. L'ergativité en tibétain: approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Louvain: Peeters. Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart & P. Widmer (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier, 281–308. Saale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies. Tournadre Nicolas. 2014. The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Nathan W. Hill and Thomas Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105-130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Tournadre, Nicolas and Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of standard Tibetan: Language and civilisation. Ithaca: Snowlion Publications. Tournadre, Nicolas and Sangda Dorje 2009. Manuel de tibétain standard: langue et civilisation. Paris: Langues & mondes, L'Asiathèque. Tournadre, Nicolas and Konchok Jiatso. 2001. Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(3). 49-111. Tournadre, Nicolas and Randy J. LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240-263. Tournadre, Nicolas and Karma Rigzin. 2015. Outline of Chocha-Ngacha. Himalayan Linguistics 14(2). 49-87. Tournadre, Nicolas, Lhakpa Norbu Sherpa, Gyurme Chodrak and Guillaume Oisel. 2009. Sherpa-English and English-Sherpa dictionary. Kathmandu: Vajra Publication. Vesalainen, Olavi and Marja Vesalainen. 1980. Clause Patterns in Lhomi. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University. Wang, Qingshan (王青山). 1995. A Grammar of Spoken Amdo Tibetan. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationality Publishing House. Watters, David E. 2006. The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22. 300-319 Widmer, Manuel. 2015. The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In J. Fleischer, E. Rieken & P. Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 53-73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Woodbury, Anthony C. 1986. Interactions of tense and evidentiality: a study of Sherpa and English. In Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 188–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Yukawa Yasutoshi 湯川恭敏. 1966. チベット語のduuの意味 Chibettogo no duu no imi [The meaning of Tibetan duu]. 言語研究 Gengo Kenkyū 49. 77-84. Yukawa Yasutoshi 湯川恭敏. 1971. チベット語の述部の輪郭 Chibettogo no jutsubu no rinkaku [Outline of Tibetan Predicates]. 言語学の基本問題 Gengogaku no kihon mondai / Basic problems in linguistics. Tokyo: 大修館書店 Taishūkan Shoten. 178-204. Yukawa Yasutoshi 湯川恭敏. 1975. チベット語の述語 Chibettogo no jutsugo [The Predicates of Tibetan] アジア・アフリカ文法硏究 Ajia Afurika bunpō kenkyū / Asian & African Linguistics 4. 1-14. Tokyo: ILCAA. Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: A comparative study. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations