Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Livelihood gains and ecological costs of NTFP dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India

Shaanker, R. U.; Ganeshaiah, K. N.; Krishnan, Smitha; Ramya, R.; Meera, C.; Aravind, N. A.; Kumar, Arvind; Rao, Dinesh; Vanraj, G.; Ramachandra, J.; Gauthier, Remi; Ghazoul, J.; Poole, Nigel; Chinnappa Reddy, B. V.

Livelihood gains and ecological costs of NTFP dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India Thumbnail


Authors

R. U. Shaanker

K. N. Ganeshaiah

Smitha Krishnan

R. Ramya

C. Meera

N. A. Aravind

Arvind Kumar

Dinesh Rao

G. Vanraj

J. Ramachandra

Remi Gauthier

J. Ghazoul

B. V. Chinnappa Reddy



Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) constitute the single largest determinant of livelihoods for scores of forest fringe communities and poor people in the tropics. In India over 50 million people are believed to be directly dependent upon NTFPs for their subsistence. However, such human dependence on NTFPs for livelihood gains (win) has most frequently been at a certain ecological cost (lose). If livelihoods are to be maintained, the existing ‘win-lose’ settings have to be steered to a ‘win-win’ mode, otherwise, there could be severe erosion of the biological resources and loss of livelihoods (‘lose-lose’). Examining the dependence of forest fringe communities on NTFPs at three sites in south India with contrasting human and ecological settings, three key factors (extent of dependence on NTFPs, indigenous ecological knowledge and market organization) are likely to constrain reaching the win-win situation. How these factors shape the ecological cost of harvesting NTFPs at the three sites is examined. Within the parameter space of these factors, it is possible to predict outcomes and associations that will conform to win-win or win-lose situations. Empirical data derived from the three study sites demonstrate the causality of the observed associations. The key for long-term livelihood gains lies in reducing the ecological cost. Certain interventions and recommendations that could optimize the balance between livelihood gains and ecological cost are proposed.

Citation

Shaanker, R. U., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Krishnan, S., Ramya, R., Meera, C., Aravind, N. A., Kumar, A., Rao, D., Vanraj, G., Ramachandra, J., Gauthier, R., Ghazoul, J., Poole, N., & Chinnappa Reddy, B. V. (2004). Livelihood gains and ecological costs of NTFP dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India. Environmental Conservation, 31(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001596

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2004
Deposit Date Jan 27, 2009
Publicly Available Date Feb 4, 2022
Journal Environmental Conservation
Print ISSN 0376-8929
Electronic ISSN 1469-4387
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 31
Issue 3
Pages 242-253
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001596
Additional Information Additional Information : © Foundation for Environmental Conservation; Published by Cambridge University Press

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations