Myanmar's strategy in the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor: a failure in hedging?

Kobayashi, Yuka; King, Josephine

Abstract

This article examines Myanmar's hedging strategies in China's Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC), a key component of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Myanmar has avoided being overly reliant on China by strategically hedging and diversifying its foreign relations with other countries in the region. However, Myanmar's ability to hedge is compromised by its domestic fragmentation, caused by the protracted civil war and rising civil–military tensions. We focus on the two advanced projects in CMEC, the Muse–Mandalay railway and Kyaukphyu deep seaport, and have conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in China–Myanmar relations (2016–2021) under the National League for Democracy (NLD). Through the fieldwork findings, we problematize the assumption in the hedging literature which takes for granted a country's competence to act strategically in their foreign policy. Our findings from the Myanmar case suggest that the state's level of fragmentation and capability to hedge are inversely proportional. The multiple actors in Myanmar's political space complicate its China policy and limit its ability to hedge effectively. This is augmented by the military coup in February 2021, which further fragmented the country, compromising Myanmar's China policy even further, making hedging a less viable framework to examine Myanmar's China strategy.

Citation

Kobayashi, Y., & King, J. (2022). Myanmar's strategy in the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor: a failure in hedging?. International Affairs, 98(3), https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac049

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Feb 7, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Apr 11, 2022
• Publication Date: May 1, 2022
• Deposit Date: Apr 19, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 19, 2022
• Journal: International Affairs
• Print ISSN: 0020-5850
• Electronic ISSN: 1468-2346
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 98
• Issue: 3
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac049
• Publisher URL: https://academic.oup.com/ia/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ia/iiac049/6564934