Development research: Convergent or divergent approaches and understandings of poverty? An introduction

Campbell, John; Holland, Jeremy

Abstract

Is it possible or indeed desirable to combine qualitative, participatory and quantitative research methods and approaches to better understand poverty? This special section of Focaal seeks to explore a number of contentious, inter-related issues that arise from multimethod research that is driven by growing international policy concerns to reduce global poverty. We seek to initiate an interdisciplinary dialog about the limits of methodological integration by examining existing research practice to better understand the strengths and limitations of combining methods which derive from different epistemological premises. We ask how methods might be combined to better address issues of causality, and whether the concept of triangulation offers a possible way forward. In examining existing research we find little in the way of shared understanding about poverty and, due to the dominance of econometrics and its insistence on using household surveys, very little middle ground where other disciplines might collaborate to rethink key conceptual and methodological issues.

Citation

Campbell, J., & Holland, J. (2005). Development research: Convergent or divergent approaches and understandings of poverty? An introduction. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 45, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.3167/092012905780909289

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2005
• Deposit Date: Dec 9, 2007
• Print ISSN: 0920-1297
• Electronic ISSN: 1558-5263
• Publisher: Berghahn Journals
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 45
• Pages: 3-17
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/092012905780909289