Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

International Law, Kelsen and the Aberrant Revolution: Excavating the Politics and Practices of Revolutionary Legality in Rhodesia and Beyond

Kumar, Vidya

International Law, Kelsen and the Aberrant Revolution: Excavating the Politics and Practices of Revolutionary Legality in Rhodesia and Beyond Thumbnail


Authors



Contributors

Nikolas M. Rajkovic
Editor

Tania Aalberts
Editor

Thomas Gammeltoft-Hanse
Editor

Abstract

Although there have been many attempts to decipher the enigmas which inhere in Kelsen’s unfathomably vast body of work on international law, I explore a different mystery in this Chapter namely: how revolution - a homeless, aberrant, and pathological creature - comes to be clothed in the power of legality. To unravel this mystery, I delineate various legal practices that have brought the doctrine of revolutionary legality into being, sustained it, and allowed it to continue to occupy a place as a doctrine of international law. I begin by tracing how this doctrine has evolved through and been shaped by various competent performances of judicial and scholarly actors, and do so by excavating the social and interpretive practices these actors use to construct the concept of a revolution’s ‘legality’ in and after particular revolutionary moments with a focus upon the 1965 Rhodesian Revolution, its antecedents, and its immediate aftermath. Though I do so elsewhere, I do not address whether the Rhodesian Revolution was ‘in fact’ a revolution. My focus here is instead on those legal practices characterising an event as revolutionary. It is therefore an examination of how international legal practices have clothed revolution in legality. I argue that the doctrine of revolutionary legality is the product of the confluence and contestation of particular historically-contingent judicial and scholarly practices which have carried the doctrine across time and space, and which shape and have shaped the international legal imaginary on revolutionary change. This Chapter explores the role these competent practices play to dress revolution in legality.

Citation

Kumar, V. (2016). International Law, Kelsen and the Aberrant Revolution: Excavating the Politics and Practices of Revolutionary Legality in Rhodesia and Beyond. In N. M. Rajkovic, T. Aalberts, & T. Gammeltoft-Hanse (Eds.), The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and their Politics (157-187). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316535134.007

Acceptance Date Sep 30, 2016
Publication Date Jul 5, 2016
Deposit Date Apr 22, 2025
Publicly Available Date Apr 22, 2025
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Pages 157-187
Book Title The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and their Politics
ISBN 9781316508435
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316535134.007
Keywords Revolution, International Law, Decolonisation, Kelsen, Jurisprudence, Legal Theory, Revolutionary Legality, Southern Rhodesia, Rhodesian Revolution, Ian Smith, British Colonialism, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC), Imperialism, Colonialism, Adjudication, Self-determination, Unilateral Declaration of Independence, Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL), Zimbabwe
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316535134.007

Files

Power of Revolutionary Legality (CUP) FINAL 2016.pdf (498 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is a draft version which was accepted before edits and proofs. Please cite only the published version.
Published in: Rajkovic, Nikolas M., Aalberts, Tania and Gammeltoft-Hanse, Thomas, (eds.), The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and their Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157-187 (2016).
Do Not Cite Without Author’s Permission






You might also like



Downloadable Citations