Review of Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax. Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, eds.

Hill, Nathan W.

Review of Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax. Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, eds.

Hill, Nathan W.

Authors

PROF Nathan Hill nh36@soas.ac.uk
Professor Tibetan&Historical Linguistics

Citation

Hill, N. W. (2011). Review of Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax. Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, eds. European bulletin of Himalayan research, 39, 200-206

Journal Article Type	Book Review
Publication Date	Jan 1, 2011
Deposit Date	Jun 17, 2013
Publicly Available Date	Feb 27, 2025
Journal	European Bulletin of Himalayan research
Print ISSN	0943-8254
Peer Reviewed	Not Peer Reviewed
Volume	39
Pages	200-206
Item Discussed	Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax.
Publisher URL	http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ebhr/pdf/EBHR_39_17.pdf
Additional Information	References : Backus, C. 1981. The Nan-chao Kingdom and Tʻang China’s Southwestern Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Beckwith, C.I. 1977. A Study of the Early Medieval Chinese, Latin, and Tibetan Historical Sources on Pre-Imperial Tibet. Indiana University PhD Dissertation. Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language . New York: H. Holt and Company. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. et al. 1988. ‘Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 85: 6002-6006. Chen, S. et al. 2006. ‘Allelic distribution of HLA class I genes in the Tibetan ethnic population of China’. International Journal of Immunogenetics 33: 439–445. Denwood, P. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Dixon, R.M.W. 1982. Where Have all the Adjectives Gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton. Dixon, R.M.W. 2004. ‘Adjective classes in typological perspective’. Adjective Classes: A cross-linguistic typology , edited by R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald, pp.1-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press. van Driem, G. 1990. ‘An exploration of Proto-Kiranti verbal morphology’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22: 27-48. van Driem, G. 1991. ‘Bahing and the Proto-Kiranti verb.’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 54.2: 336-356. van Driem, G. 1992. ‘Le proto-kiranti revisité, morphologie verbale du lohorung’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 24: 33-75. van Driem, G. 1997. ‘A new analysis of the Limbu verb’. Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas, edited by D. Bradley, pp.153-173. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Dpal-ldan-bkra-shis, et al. 1996. Language Materials of China’s Monguor Minority: Huzhu Mongghul and Minhe Mangghuer. Sino-Platonic papers no. 69. Garrett, E. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD thesis at University of California Los Angeles. Gayden, et al. 2007. ‘The Himalayas as a Directional Barrier to Gene Flow’. The American Journal of Human Genetics 80: 884-894. Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction . Philadelphia: Benjamins Pub. Co. Haspelmath, M. 2007. ‘Pre-established categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology.’ Linguistic Typology 11: 119-132. de Jong, J.W. 1989. The Story of Rāma in Tibet: Text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Stuttgart: F. Steiner. Lewis, P. W and Bai Bibo 1996. Hani-English/English-Hani Dictionary: Haqniqdoq-Yilyidoq, Doqlo-Soqdaoq. London: Kegan Paul International. de Saussurre, Ferdinand 1919. Cours de Linguistique Générale . Paris: Payot. Su et al. 2000. ‘Y chromosome haplotypes reveal prehistorical migrations to the Himalayas.’ Human Genetics 107.6: 582-590. Suzuki Hiroyuki 鈴木博之 2005.‘チベット語丹巴・梭坡[Sogpho] 方言の音声分析 Chibettogo Danba-Sopo [Sogpho] Hōgen no Onseibunseki [Phonetic Analysis of the Danba Sogpho Tibetan Dialect.’ ニダバ Nidaba 34: 96-104. Tournadre, N. 1996. L’ergativité en Tibétain: Appr oche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Paris: Peeters. Tournadre, N. 2008. ‘Arguments against the concept of “conjunct”/“disjunct” in Tibetan.’ Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, edited by B. Huber et al., pp.281-308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies. Zhao, Mian et al. 2009. ‘Mitochondrial genome evidence reveals successful Late Paleolithic settlement on the Tibetan Plateau.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106.50: 21230-21235.