PROF Nathan Hill nh36@soas.ac.uk
Professor Tibetan&Historical Linguistics
Review of North East Indian Linguistics: Volume 3. Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey, and Mark W. Post, eds. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. 2011.
Hill, Nathan W.
Authors
Citation
Hill, N. W. (2012). Review of North East Indian Linguistics: Volume 3. Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey, and Mark W. Post, eds. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. 2011. European bulletin of Himalayan research, 40, 134-138
Journal Article Type | Book Review |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2012 |
Deposit Date | Jun 11, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 27, 2025 |
Journal | European Bulletin of Himalayan research |
Print ISSN | 0943-8254 |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 40 |
Pages | 134-138 |
Item Discussed | North East Indian Linguistics: Volume 3 |
Additional Information | References : Beyer, S. V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press. Bradley, D. 1997. ‘Tibeto-Burman languages and classification’. In Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas, edited by David Bradley, pp. 1-72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Chelliah, S. L. 1997. A Grammar of Meithei. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Das Gupta, K. 1980. The Tangsa Language: A synopsis. Shillong: The Philology Section, Research Department, North East Frontier Agency. DeLancey, S. 1989. ‘Verb agreement in proto-Tibeto-Burman.’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52(2): 315-333. DeLancey, S. 2010. ‘Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman.’ Himalayan Linguistics 9(1): 1-39. Gyurmé, K. 1992. Le clair miroir: enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Arvillard: Editions Prajñā . Jacques, G. 2007. ‘A shared suppletive pattern in the pronominal systems of Chang Naga and Southern Chang.’ Cahiers de Linguistique: Asie Orientale 36(1): 61–78. de Jong, J. W. 1989. The Story of Rāma in Tibet: Text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Stuttgart: F. Steiner. de Kőrös, C. 1984 [1834]. Grammar of the Tibetan language. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. Meillet, A. 1925. La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & co. Morey, S. and M. Post (eds.) 2008. North East Indian Linguistics. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India. Morey, S. and M. Post (eds.) 2010. North East Indian Linguistics. Volume 2. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India. Parratt, S. N. 2005. The Court Chronicle of the Kings of Manipur: The Cheitharon Kumpapa. New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Schmidt, I. J. 1839. Grammatik der Tibetischen Sprache. St. Petersburg: W. Gräff. Singh, N. K. 1967. Cheitharol Kumbābā. Imphal: Maṇipurī Sāhitya Pariṣad. Sommerschuh, C. 2008. Einführung in die Tibetische Schriftsprache: Lehrbuch für den Unterricht und das Selbststudium. Norderstedt : Books on Demand, 2008. Watkins, C. 1994 [1976]. ‘Towards Indo-European syntax: problems and pseudo-problems.’ In Selected writings: Language and linguistics. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 242-263. |
Files
Hill_NEIL3Review_EBHR_40_13.pdf
(180 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Grouping sounds into evolving units for the purpose of historical language comparison
(2024)
Journal Article
A Tibetan Passive Construction in the Old Tibetan Rāmāyaṇa
(2023)
Journal Article
Chinese Transcription of Buddhist Terms in the Late Hàn Dynasty
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search