Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003

Hill, Nathan W.

Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003 Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Proposing many new cognate sets and building on many decades of his own previous research, Matisoff (2003) represents a major contribution to Tibeto-Burman linguistics. Unfortunately, Matisoff’s use of Tibetan is marred by errors of fact and analysis, which together undermine confidence in his reconstructions.

Citation

Hill, N. W. (2009). Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. Language and linguistics = 語言暨語言學, 10(1), 173-195

Journal Article Type Book Review
Publication Date Jan 1, 2009
Deposit Date Jan 6, 2009
Publicly Available Date Jan 22, 2025
Print ISSN 1606-822X
Electronic ISSN 2309-5067
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 1
Pages 173-195
Item Discussed Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction
Additional Information References : Behr, Wolfgang 1994. [Review of Beyer 1992] Oriens 34: 557-563. Benedict, Paul 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: at the University Press. Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan language. New York: State University of New York. Reprint 1993, (Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica series, 116.) Delhi: Sri Satguru. Bielmeier, Roland 1988. The Reconstruction of the Stop Series and the Verbal System in Tibetan. Languages and History in East Asia: Festschrift for Tatsuo Nishida on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Kyoto: Shokado. 15-27. Bskal bzang vgyur med 1981. Bod kyi brdav sprod rig pavi khrid rgyun rab gsal me long. Chengdu: Si khron Mi rigs Dpe skrun khang. _______ 1992. Le clair miroir: enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Nicolas Tournadre and Heather Stoddard, trans. Arvillard : Editions Prajñā. Choix III 1990: Yoshiro Imaeda and Tsuguhito Takeuchi, Choix de documents tibétains conservés à la Bibliothèque nationale, Tome III, Corpus syllabique. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale. Choix IV 2001: Yoshiro Imaeda, Tsuguhito Takeuchi, Izumi Hoshi, Yoshimichi Ohara and Iwao Ishikawa, Choix de documents tibétains conservés à la Bibliothèque nationale, Tome IV, Corpus syllabique, Tokyo: ILCAA, Université des Langues Étrangères de Tokyo. Coblin, W. South 1974. An early Tibetan word for horse. Journal of the American Oriental Society 94: 124-5. ______ 1976. “Notes on Tibetan verbal morphology.” T'oung Pao. 52. 1-3: 45-60. ______ 1991. A Study of the Old Tibetan Shanshu Paraphrase. Journal of the American Oriental Society (Part I) 111.2: 303-322. (Part II) 111.3: 523-539. Davidson, Roland M. 1996. [Review of Beyer 1992] Philosophy East and West 46.1: 119-122. Franke, Herbert, ed. 2005-. Wörterbuch der tibetischen Schriftsprache. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Kommission beim Verlag C. H. Beck. Hahn, Michael 1994. Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. 6th edition. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag. Hill, Nathan W. 2004. “Compte rendu.” (Review of Paul G. Hackett, A Tibetan Verb Lexicon. Ithaca: Snow Lion, 2003.) Revue d'Etudes Tibétaines 6: 78-98. Inaba Shōju 稲葉正就 1954. チベット古典文法学Chibettogo koten bunpōgaku. 京都Kyōto, 法増刊Hōzōkan. Jäschke, Heinrich August 1881. Tibetan English Dictionary. London: Unger Brothers. Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Ph.D. Thesis. Université Paris 7. de Jong, Jan Williem 1959. Mi la ras pa’i rnam thar: texte tibétain de la vie de Milarépa. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton. LaPolla, Randy J. 1994. [Review of Beyer 1992] Language 70.1: 195-196. Laufer, Berthold 1915. “Bird Divination Among the Tibetans” T’oung Pao 15: 1- 110; reprinted in Sino-Tibetan Studies: selected papers on the art, folklore, history linguistics and prehistory of sciences in China and Tibet. 2 vols. Delhi: Rakesh Goel, 1987: 354-463. Li Fang-Kuei 1959. Tibetan Glo-ba-‘dring. Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren dedicata. Egerod, Søren, ed. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard: 55-9. Li Fang-kuei and Coblin, W. South 1987. A Study of the Old Tibetan Inscriptions, (Special Publications 91). Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica. Miller, Roy Andrew 1994. A New Grammar of Written Tibetan. [Review of Beyer 1992]. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114.1: 67-76. Ngag dbang tshul khrims 1997. Brda dkrol gsel gyi me long. Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang. Petech, Luciano 1977. The Kingdom of Ladakh c. 950 - 1842 A.D. (Serie Orientale Roma 51) Rome: Istituto Italiano per il media ed Estremo Oriente. Richardson, Hugh 1985. A Corpus of Early Tibetan Inscriptions. (James G. Forlong series 29). London: Royal Asiatic Society. Róna-Tas, András 1985. Wiener Vorlesungen zur Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte Tibets. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 13). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien. Shangs pa Bkav brgyud bla rabs kyi rnam thar. (Gangs can rig mdzod 28). Lhasa: Bod ljongs Bod yig dpe rnying dpe skrun khang, 1996. Schiefner, Anton 1852. "Tibetischen Studien" Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersboug 1: 324-394. Schroeter, Rev. Frederic Christian Gotthelf 1826. A Dictionary of the Bhotanta or Boutan Language. Serampore. Schwieger, Peter 2006. Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Haale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH. Simon, Walter 1964. Tibetan Lexicography and Etymological Research. Transactions of the Philological Society: 85-107. Snellgrove, David 1954. (review of Marcelle Lalou's) Manuel elementaire de tibétain classique. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 16.1: 198-199. Sprigg, Richard Keith 1968. “The role of ‘R’ in the development of the modern spoken Tibetan dialects” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 21.3. 301-311. _____ 1974. (Review of James A. Matisoff's) The Loloish Tonal Split Revisited. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 37.1: 259-262. _____ 2002. Balti-English English-Balti dictionary. Richmond: RoutledgeCurzon. Takeuchi Tsuguhito 武内紹人 1995. Old Tibetan contracts from Central Asia 中央アジア発現古チベット語契約文書, Tōkyō 東京: Daizō shuppan _____ 1997-1998. Old Tibetan manuscripts from East Turkestan in the Stein Collection of the British Library. Tokyo and London: The Centre for East Asian Cultural Studies for Unesco, The Toyo Bunko, The British Library. Tsan chung 1979. Dag yig gsar sgrigs. Xining: mtsho sngon mi rigs dpe skrun khang. Uray, Géza 1953. The suffix -e in Tibetan. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 3: 229–244. Zeisler, Bettina 2004. Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: a comparative study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations