Dr Paul Giladi pg30@soas.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy
Idealism and the metaphysics of individuality
Giladi, Paul
Authors
Abstract
What is arguably the central criticism of Hegel’s philosophical system by the Continental tradition, a criticism which represents a unifying thread in the diverse work of Schelling, Feuerbach, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Adorno, is that Hegel fails to do justice to the notion of individuality. My aim in this article is to counter the claim that Hegel’s idea of the concrete universal fails to properly explain the real uniqueness of individuals. In what follows, I argue that while the Continental critique (as it is particularly expressed by Adorno) is prima facie attractive, it is ultimately misguided.This is because the critics of Hegel fail to correctly understand (1) his principal argument in ‘Sense-Certainty’; (2) crucial features of his logico-metaphysics; and (3) his notion of wholeness. I contend that carefully explicating these important parts of the Hegelian system not only shows that Hegel’s metaphysical commitments are not those that do not leave meaningful room for or make adequate sense of individuality, but that they also reveal a sophisticated treatment of the interdependency between the categories of individuality, particularity and universality in a way which conceives of individuality robustly.
Citation
Giladi, P. (2017). Idealism and the metaphysics of individuality. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(2), 208-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715622522
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 1, 2017 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Sep 9, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 9, 2023 |
Journal | Philosophy and Social Criticism |
Print ISSN | 0191-4537 |
Electronic ISSN | 1461-734X |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 43 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 208-229 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715622522 |
Keywords | Theodor Adorno, critical theory, G. W. F. Hegel, idealism, individuals |
Files
Hegel Adorno Paper revision.pdf
(463 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the version of the article accepted for publication in Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43 (2). pp. 208-229 (2017). Published by Sage. Re-use is subject to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
You might also like
Scientism as Ideology: Speculative Naturalism as Qualified-Decoloniality
(2023)
Book Chapter
Does contemporary recognition theory rest on a mistake?
(2023)
Journal Article
Persons, Peirceish, perfidious pluralism – rescuing Sellars
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search