Dr Paul Giladi pg30@soas.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy
Persons, Peirceish, perfidious pluralism – rescuing Sellars
Giladi, Paul
Authors
Abstract
In Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man (1962), Wilfrid Sellars contends that there is tension between manifest image (MI) and scientific image (SI) discursive formations. To end the tension and resolve the clash between the MI and the SI, Sellars does not aim to reconcile the two images. Rather, through the application of his functional classification semantics, typified by his distinction between logical irreducibility and causal reducibility, he aims to join the normative category of persons to the SI, to enrich and complete the SI. In other words, the way all things hang together stereoscopically in one unified and coherent image is by integrating persons into Peirceish. My principal aim in this paper is to argue that, rather than resolve the clash between the MI and the SI by joining the ‘lifeworldy’ conceptual framework of persons to the SI for the purpose of enriching and completing the SI, what Sellars ought to have done is adopt a negative dialectical ‘resolution’ of the clash between the images. This strategy invites one to dismantle the Placement Problem through the logic of “disintegration.” I take Sellars to have curiously hinted at this Adornian intellectual orientation in the concluding sentence of Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (1956).
Citation
Giladi, P. (2022). Persons, Peirceish, perfidious pluralism – rescuing Sellars. Philosophical inquiries, 10(2), 193-228. https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v10i1.386
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 3, 2022 |
Publication Date | Mar 3, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Sep 8, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 4, 2026 |
Journal | Philosophical Inquiries |
Print ISSN | 2281-8618 |
Electronic ISSN | 2282-0248 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 193-228 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v10i1.386 |
Keywords | Sellars; Manifest image; Scientific image; Peirceish; Adorno; negative dialectics. |
Publisher URL | https://philinq.it/index.php/philinq/article/view/386 |
Files
This file is under embargo until Mar 4, 2026 due to copyright reasons.
Contact outputs@soas.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Scientism as Ideology: Speculative Naturalism as Qualified-Decoloniality
(2023)
Book Chapter
Does contemporary recognition theory rest on a mistake?
(2023)
Journal Article
Post-Analytic Philosophy and Hegelian Amphibians
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search