Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Chopping the world into bits: object relations theory and the good governance norm

Gallagher, Julia

Chopping the world into bits: object relations theory and the good governance norm Thumbnail


Authors

Julia Gallagher



Abstract

This article explores norms as idealizations, in an attempt to grasp their significance as projects for international organizations. We can think about norms as ‘standards of proper behaviour’. In this sense they are somehow natural, things to be taken for granted, noticed only really when they are absent. We can also think about norms as ‘understandings about what is good and appropriate’. In this sense, norms embody a stronger sense of virtue and an ability to enable progress or improvement. Norms become ideal when they are able to conflate what is good with what is appropriate, standard, or proper. It is when the good becomes ‘natural’ that a norm appears immanent and non-contestable, and so acquires an idealized form.45 Along with the other articles in this special issue, I will attempt to challenge some of the complacency surrounding the apparent naturalness and universality of norms employed in international relations.

Citation

Gallagher, J. (in press). Chopping the world into bits: object relations theory and the good governance norm. International Theory: A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy, 6(2), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000153

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 8, 2014
Online Publication Date Jun 20, 2014
Deposit Date Jul 21, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jun 22, 2020
Print ISSN 1752-9719
Electronic ISSN 1752-9727
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 2
Pages 332-349
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000153

Files

Gallagher_ Chopping.pdf (193 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in International Theory https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000153. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use.
©Cambridge University Press 2014






Downloadable Citations