Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River

Asiyanbi, Adeniyi P

A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River Thumbnail


Authors

Adeniyi P Asiyanbi



Abstract

This paper offers a critical assessment of REDD+ in Nigeria through a political ecology perspective. Focusing on questions of property rights and resource access, it maps the discursive articulations and contestations through which carbon rights are being determined. It also shows how these articulations and contestations are linked to land and forest rights, and how they shape everyday access to the forest. Evidence from the Nigerian case suggests that factors that complicate rights and undermine access to resources for forest communities under REDD+ are immanent to the contested terrain constituted in part by REDD+ proposals, proponents’ discourses and practices geared towards securing the forest for REDD+. Efforts to secure property rights and guarantee the permanence of REDD+ forests align with economic, ecological and ideological aspirations of state and non-state actors to produce a regime of militarised protectionism. I demonstrate how, in addition to its material and symbolic facilitation of the emergent carbon forestry economy, militarised protectionism as a regime of exclusion also constitutes collateral political economies of ‘more-than-carbon’ forest resources (such as timber and non-timber forest products) which perpetuate capital accumulation by the elites. It is this kind of exclusion–accumulation dialectic legitimised by carbon forestry claims that this paper describes as carbonised exclusion. The paper thus furthers debates on the political ecology of REDD+ and other carbon forestry projects, while productively engaging technocentric literature on REDD+ and property rights.

Citation

Asiyanbi, A. P. (2016). A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River. Geoforum, 77, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.016

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 18, 2016
Online Publication Date Oct 27, 2016
Publication Date Oct 27, 2016
Deposit Date Nov 27, 2016
Publicly Available Date Nov 27, 2016
Journal Geoforum
Print ISSN 0016-7185
Electronic ISSN 1872-9398
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 77
Pages 146-156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.016

Files

Asiyanbi_23255_A political ecology of REDD_Property Relations in Nigeria.pdf (587 Kb)
PDF





Downloadable Citations