Does Culture Impact Preferred Employee attributes in Complaint Handling Encounters?

Gruber, Thorsten; Abosag, Ibrahim; Reppel, Alexander; Szmigin, Isabelle; Löfgren, Martin

Abstract

Recently, Gruber et al.’s (2011) Kano study revealed that complaining customers in Saudi Arabia are less difficult to delight than UK customers. The present study investigates whether these differences are caused by different service sector development stages, as suggested in their study, or by cultural differences instead. Data were collected using Kano questionnaires from 151 respondents with complaining experience in Singapore. This country was chosen as it has a highly developed service economy (like the UK) but also a collectivistic culture (like Saudi Arabia). The analysis reveals that Singaporean customers show the same preferences as those in the UK. We consider this as a strong indicator for the suggested impact of the stage of service sector development rather than cultural differences on complaining customers’ preferences of frontline employee attributes. Our results support the findings by Gruber et al. (2011). By doing so, they surprisingly refute previous research which concluded that national culture plays a significant role in shaping customer expectations during complaint handling encounters. Our study especially corroborates the notion of a life cycle of quality attributes that had been found for goods and services and the preferred attributes of frontline employees dealing with customer complaints.

Citation

Gruber, T., Abosag, I., Reppel, A., Szmigin, I., & Löfgren, M. (2013). Does Culture Impact Preferred Employee attributes in Complaint Handling Encounters?. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(11-12), 1301-1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.822664

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2013
• Deposit Date: Oct 26, 2015
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 19, 2021
• Journal: Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
• Print ISSN: 1478-3363
• Electronic ISSN: 1478-3371
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 11-12
• Pages: 1301-1315
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.822664