Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Discrimination through Bargaining Structures: Gender Bias in the National Coal Board and British Coal

Fine, Ben

Discrimination through Bargaining Structures: Gender Bias in the National Coal Board and British Coal Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

In its analysis of the pay determination of British Coal canteen workers, this article introduces that by Kathy O’Donnell, who argues that, in all but name, canteen workers were part of a single bargaining structure that included male surface mineworkers. It is drawn from the evidence prepared for the National Union of Mineworkers in late 1990 in support of an equal pay claim for female canteen workers and cleaners employed by British Coal. The claim was successful. Two points clearly emerge. First, job segregation allowed women workers to be placed in a separate grading structure from men, and even if there was some overlap between the two at the bottom of the one and at the top of the other, the situation was one in which there was no effective difference from the operation of a single grading structure. But for this institutional segregation, there would have been a much more transparent instance of pay discrimination.

Citation

Fine, B. (2023). Discrimination through Bargaining Structures: Gender Bias in the National Coal Board and British Coal. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 44(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.3828/hsir.2023.44.4

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 4, 2023
Publication Date Dec 10, 2023
Deposit Date Dec 12, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 3, 2024
Journal Historical Studies in Industrial Relations
Print ISSN 1362-1572
Electronic ISSN 2049-4459
Publisher Liverpool University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Issue 1
Pages 63-74
DOI https://doi.org/10.3828/hsir.2023.44.4

Files

Fine Discriminaton and Bargaing Finalbf2.pdf (243 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is the version of the article accepted for publication in Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 44 (1). pp. 63-74 (2023), published by Liverpool University Press. Re-use is subject to the publisher’s terms and conditions.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations