Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in Relation to Vulnerability Reduction Programmes

Béné, Christophe; Godfrey-Wood, Rachel; Newsham, Andrew; Davies, Mark

Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in Relation to Vulnerability Reduction Programmes Thumbnail


Authors

Christophe Béné

Rachel Godfrey-Wood

Mark Davies



Abstract

Resilience is becoming influential in development and vulnerability reduction sectors such as social protection, disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Policy makers, donors and international development agencies are now increasingly referring to the term. In that context, the objective of this paper was to assess in a critical manner the advantages and limits of resilience. While the review highlights some positive elements –in particular the ability of the term to foster integrated approach across sectors– it also shows that resilience has important limitations. In particular it is not a pro-poor concept, and the objective of poverty reduction cannot simply be substituted by resilience building.

Citation

Béné, C., Godfrey-Wood, R., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in Relation to Vulnerability Reduction Programmes. Brighton

Working Paper Type Working Paper
Deposit Date Feb 11, 2014
Publicly Available Date Sep 18, 2024
Pages 1-61
Series ISSN 20400209
Keywords social protection; disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, poverty,
vulnerability
Publisher URL http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp405.pdf

Files

Bene et al 2012 Resilience, utopia or tyranny IDS Wp405.pdf (348 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
"A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
All rights reserved. Reproduction, copy, transmission, or translation of any part of this publication may be made only under the following
conditions:
• with the prior permission of the publisher; or
• with a licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd., 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE, UK,
or from another national licensing agency; or
• under the terms set out below.

This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for teaching or nonprofit purposes, but not for resale.
Formal permission is required for all such uses, but normally will be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances, or for
re- use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher and a fee may be
payable. "






You might also like



Downloadable Citations