DR Vanja Hamzic vh1@soas.ac.uk
Reader in Law History and Anthropology
Law
Hamzić, Vanja
Authors
Contributors
Jessica Lake
Editor
Lorinda Cramer
Editor
Abstract
The present chapter seeks to provide a broad overview of some of the main directions of research in critical scholarship on law and gender in the high time of exploitation colonialism. It does not focus on settler colonial societies, nor on the Iberian or Dutch and Belgian colonial projects, with the British and French legal and cultural interventions being its primary concern. However, as these global interventions necessarily involved other important actors, I also endeavour to show how, for instance, German natural law theorists joined the other Enlightenment sciences of the human to justify colonial extraction and the new regimes of hierarchical personhood, or how gender nonconforming individuals in the metropole as well as gender diverse communities in the colonies—such as South Asian hijṛē—were affected by the legal changes aimed at curtailing would-be sexual and gender transgressions, by making them relatable and mutually reinforcing in the court of law. Colonial law was often imposed to cement the existing and already entrenched processes of economic and cultural intervention. Thus, the chapter demonstrates how colonial and Orientalist projections of Muslim ostensibly ‘lax’ sexual and gender mores influenced the developments relative to gender and sexuality in Islamic law and, more broadly, Muslim discourses on classical Arabic literature and society. And, in the case of French West Africa, I show how an extractivist gender-binary logic was employed by eighteenth-century French enslavers in Senegambia, affecting both the enslaved shipped across the Middle Passage as well as the remaining local populations—with the example of gender-diverse artisanal castes, known in the Mande languages as ɲamakalaw. Finally, I zoom in on tell-tale fin-de-siècle examples of feminist resistance, including the early inroads of Islamic feminism, which paved the way for some of the paradigmatic legal changes in the twentieth century.
I maintain that the colonial difference—including that based on a patriarchal, hierarchical understanding of gender—was systemically built into law and society between the 1750s and 1950s; at the same time, multifarious resistance to these colonial designs around the world ensured that they be challenged and eventually disrupted, particularly via heterogeneous formations of transnational feminist solidarity.
Citation
Hamzić, V. (in press). Law. In J. Lake, & L. Cramer (Eds.), A Cultural History of Gender, 1750-1950. Bloomsbury
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2024 |
---|---|
Deposit Date | Sep 20, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 2, 2124 |
Book Title | A Cultural History of Gender, 1750-1950 |
Files
This file is under embargo until Jan 2, 2124 due to copyright reasons.
Contact outputs@soas.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Rival Systems: Islamic International Law during the Cold War
(2024)
Book Chapter
Legal Production of Racial Capitalism: Botany, International Law and Senegambia in Eighteenth-Century Worldmaking
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Dis-temporal Re-distributions: Worldings beyond the Racial Capitalist Gender Binary in Eighteenth-Century Senegambia and Colonial Louisiana
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search