DR Meera Sabaratnam ms140@soas.ac.uk
Reader in International Relations
Is IR Theory White? Racialised Subject-Positioning in Three Canonical Texts
Sabaratnam, Meera
Authors
Abstract
Racism is a historically specific structure of modern global power which generates hierarchies of the human and affirms white supremacy. This has far-reaching material and epistemological consequences in the present, one of which is the production and naturalisation of white-racialised subject positions in academic discourse. This article develops a framework for analysing whiteness through subject-positioning, synthesising insights from critical race scholarship that seek to dismantle its epistemological tendencies. This framework identifies white subject-positioning as patterned by interlocking epistemologies of immanence, ignorance and innocence. The article then interrogates how these epistemological tendencies produce limitations and contradictions in international theory through an analysis of three seminal and canonical texts: Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Politics (1979), Robert Keohane’s After Hegemony (1984), and Alexander Wendt’s Social Theory of International Politics (1999). It shows that these epistemologies produce contradictions and weaknesses within the texts by systematically severing the analysis of the international system and the ‘West’ from its actual imperial conditions of possibility. The article outlines pathways for overcoming these limitations and suggests that continued inattention to the epistemological consequences of race for IR theory is intellectually unsustainable.
Citation
Sabaratnam, M. (2020). Is IR Theory White? Racialised Subject-Positioning in Three Canonical Texts. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829820971687
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 7, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 25, 2020 |
Publication Date | Nov 25, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Sep 9, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 9, 2020 |
Journal | Millennium: Journal of International Studies |
Print ISSN | 0305-8298 |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-9021 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 49 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 3-31 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829820971687 |
Files
0305829820971687.pdf
(221 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
You might also like
Complex indebtedness: justice and the crisis of liberal order
(2023)
Journal Article
Introduction to Archive Collection: 100 years of Empire and Decolonization
(2022)
Journal Article
Teaching IR Globally, Part II
(2020)
Journal Article
Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
(2019)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search