Markus Lederer
REDD+ and the State: New Forest Politics in Costa Rica, Vietnam and Indonesia
Lederer, Markus; Höhne, Chris; Navarro, Guillermo; Siciliano, Giuseppina; Alonso, Villalobos
Authors
Chris Höhne
Guillermo Navarro
DR Giuseppina Siciliano gs45@soas.ac.uk
Snr Lecturer in Sustainable Development
Villalobos Alonso
Abstract
The objective of the paper is to shed some light on one aspect of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) that so far has only indirectly been at the centre of the debate, the interplay between public institutions and REDD+ practices. The paper, therefore, analyses the evolvement of REDD+ in Costa Rica, Indonesia and Vietnam asking the following three interrelated questions: 1/What have states done to make REDD+ work and have public institutions set-up the necessary infrastructure? 2/Have states changed their practice in the forest sector due to REDD+ leading to a positive outcome? 3/Has the involvement of states with REDD+ led to a strengthening of state institutions (or of civil society) as guardians of the forest? Our argument is that the infrastructure forq2 REDD+ has largely been set up by public administrations and that the reach and ambition but also the capacities of the state have increased in different degrees across our case studies. We also see some first instances that REDD+ has empowered new actor coalitions, has brought in new ideas and has led to a diffusion of new and often better practices in some instances. Finally, we claim that in a few cases also some unintended consequences are visible, as REDD+ has led to reforms within public institutions (e.g. in Indonesia), while in others it has rarely changed the business as usual dynamics in the forestry sector (e.g. mostly in Vietnam and Costa Rica).
Citation
Lederer, M., Höhne, C., Navarro, G., Siciliano, G., & Alonso, V. (2020). REDD+ and the State: New Forest Politics in Costa Rica, Vietnam and Indonesia. Sociology, 8(2), 29-49
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 10, 2020 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 2, 2120 |
Journal | Sociology |
Print ISSN | 0038-0385 |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-8684 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 29-49 |
Files
This file is under embargo until Dec 2, 2120 due to copyright reasons.
Contact outputs@soas.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Hydropower, climate change and sustainable energy transitions
(2023)
Book Chapter
COP26: A “just” decision-making process is needed for a “just” transition
(2021)
Digital Artefact
Community-led energy solutions as the future of just and clean energy transitions
(2021)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search