Is ʔ an Element? Towards a Non-segmental Phonology

Jensen, Sean

Abstract

This paper argues that the element calculus of Government Phonology is overburdened. In particular it shows that the simple act of supposing extra elements to explain consonantal phenomena leads to far reaching and undesirable empirical consequences. An alternative approach is proposed which leaves the elemental inventory containing only those elements attested in both nuclei and non-nuclei. The phonetic impression of consonantism is attributed to the direct interpretation of supra-skeletal structure. Some typical textbook problems involving consonant ‘mutations’ are explored in light of this simple shift of perspective, with attractive solutions. The metatheoretical benefits of this approach are highlighted and particular areas of existing supra-skeletal theory are singled out as likely to require ‘tweaking’.

Citation

Jensen, S. Is ʔ an Element? Towards a Non-segmental Phonology. London

• Working Paper Type: Working Paper
• Deposit Date: Dec 14, 2011
• Publicly Available Date: Dec 16, 2022
• Keywords: phonology, elements, glottal, consonants, Government Phonology, lenition, fortition