Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

War’s Perpetuity: Disabled Bodies of War and the Exoskeleton of Equality

Heathcote, Gina

War’s Perpetuity: Disabled Bodies of War and the Exoskeleton of Equality Thumbnail


Authors

Gina Heathcote



Abstract

This paper responds to battlefield technologies that enhance the endurance and capacities of the wearer, known as exoskeletons. Following the argument that exoskeleton technology is set to provide equality for bodies on the battlefield in the near future, I look at how both law and war construct and continually re-deploy a male body as the standard form of materiality within a deeply embedded masculine subjectivity. As such, the male body provides a persistent indicator of what it means to be human. Assistive technologies, such as exoskeletons, work to render female bodies ‘closer’ to male capabilities in armed conflict situations. At the same time, the maiming of male bodies in conflict can be charted as a persistent outcome of armed conflict that has received scant attention within the study of the gendered effects of armed conflict. War’s production of the disabled male body has also led to significant developments with respect to assistive technologies, via the work of, in particular, the US military. I argue that the investment of the US military into the development of exoskeletons, when understood alongside the US military’s investment in assistive mobility technologies for returned soldiers, raises questions about the futility of creating technology only to perpetuate the existence of the battlefield. Far from a project built on gender equality goals, investment in exoskeleton technology seemingly underlines the manner in which the male body of war will increasingly be able to return to the battlefield, to be maimed and to be restored in perpetuity. I conclude by arguing exoskeletons should be used to reimagine subjectivity, via debility, with a mindfulness of the material effects and underlying philosophical traces within subjectivity. I argue for a shift in approaching subjectivity via an intersectional and post-human model, rather than a legal subject that perpetuates modernist man, that promotes a thin understanding of gender equality or deploys exoskeletons as a tool for the destructive impulses of armed conflict.

Citation

Heathcote, G. (2018). War’s Perpetuity: Disabled Bodies of War and the Exoskeleton of Equality. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 44(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1470447

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 5, 2018
Online Publication Date Aug 1, 2018
Publication Date Aug 1, 2018
Deposit Date Jun 18, 2018
Publicly Available Date Aug 31, 2018
Journal Australian Feminist Law Journal
Print ISSN 1320-0968
Electronic ISSN 2204-0064
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Issue 1
Pages 71-91
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1470447

Files

Heathcote Wars Perpetuity Disabled Bodies of War.pdf (508 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© 2018 Australian Feminist Law Journal Inc. This is the accepted verion of an article published by Taylor and Francis in Australian Feminist Law Journal on 01 Aug 2018: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1470447






Downloadable Citations