Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Psychology and Ethical Epistemology: An Ashʿarī Debate with Muʿtazilī Ethical Realism, 11th-12th C.

Shihadeh, Ayman

Psychology and Ethical Epistemology: An Ashʿarī Debate with Muʿtazilī Ethical Realism, 11th-12th C. Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

This article examines a hitherto unstudied debate, turning on the epistemology of value judgements, between Ashʿarīs and Baṣran Muʿtazilīs of the late eleventh and twelfth centuries. Al-Ghazālī and al-Rāzī countered Muʿtazilī ethical realism, here defended by al-Malāḥimī, by developing an emotive subjectivism underpinned by increasingly sophisticated psychological accounts of ethical motivation. Value judgements, they maintained, arise not from knowledge of some ethical attributes of acts themselves, but from subjective inclinations, which are often elusive because they can be unconscious or indirect. We also argue against the widespread notion that Ashʿarīs espoused an anti-rationalist ethics, and we show that they were not only ethical rationalists, but also the more innovative side.

Citation

Shihadeh, A. (2021). Psychology and Ethical Epistemology: An Ashʿarī Debate with Muʿtazilī Ethical Realism, 11th-12th C. Journal of Arabic and Islamic studies, 21, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.9573

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 10, 2020
Online Publication Date Jan 4, 2022
Publication Date Dec 31, 2021
Deposit Date Sep 16, 2020
Publicly Available Date Sep 16, 2020
Journal Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies
Electronic ISSN 0806-198X
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 21
Pages 81-102
DOI https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.9573
Publisher URL https://journals.uio.no/JAIS/article/view/9573

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations