Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The State of Sino-Tibetan

Hill, Nathan W.

The State of Sino-Tibetan Thumbnail


Authors



Citation

Hill, N. W. (2017). The State of Sino-Tibetan. Archiv orientální, 85(2), 305-315

Journal Article Type Book Review
Acceptance Date Jul 9, 2017
Publication Date Jan 1, 2017
Deposit Date Sep 10, 2017
Publicly Available Date Sep 10, 2017
Journal Archiv Orientální
Print ISSN 0044-8699
Electronic ISSN 2787-9461
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 85
Issue 2
Pages 305-315
Item Discussed The Sino-Tibetan Languages
Additional Information References : Benedict, Paul K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: a Conspectus. Cambridge: at the University Press. Button, Christopher (2012). Proto-Northern Chin. Berkeley: STEDT. Conrady, August (1896). Eine indochinesische Causativ-Denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: O. Harrassowitz. Brandon Dotson and Agnieszka Helman-Wazny (2016). Codicology, Paleography, and Orthography of Early Tibetan Documents: Methods and a Case Study. Vienna: Association for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies, University of Vienna. Gong Xun (2016). “A phonological history of Amdo Tibetan rhymes.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79.2: 347–374. Gong Xun (2016). “Prenasalized reflex of Old Tibetan <ld-> and related clusters in Central Tibetan.” Cahiers de linguistique asie orientale 45: 127-147. Jacques, Guillaume (2014). ‘On Coblin’s Law.’ Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Richard VanNess Simmons and Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. 155-165. Jacques, Guillaume (2014). Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du Tangoute. Leiden: Brill. Jones, Robert B. (1961). Karen Linguistic Studies: Description, comparison, and texts. Berkeley: University of California Press. Haller, Felix (2009). “Switch-Reference in Tibetan.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman 32.2: 45-70. Haudricourt, André-Georges (1946). “Restitution du Karen commun.” Bulletin de la société de Linguistique de Paris 42: 103-111. Haudricourt, André-Georges (1953). “A propos de la restitution du Karen commun.” Bulletin de la société de Linguistique de Paris 49: 129-132. Hill, Nathan W. (2009) 'Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.' 語言暨語言學 / Languages and Linguistics, 10 (1). pp. 173-195. Hill, Nathan W. (2012) “Tibetan -las, -nas, and -bas.” Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 41 (1). pp. 3-38. Hill, Nathan W. (2013). “ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan.” Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1-16. Hill, Nathan W. (2013). “The Emergence of the Pluralis majestatis and the Relative Chronology of Old Tibetan Texts.” Franz-Karl Ehrhard and Petra Maurer, eds. Nepalica-Tibetica: Festgabe for Christoph Cüppers. Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH, pp. 249-262. Hill, Nathan W. (2015) “Tibetan *-as > -os.” International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Reconstruction 12: 163-173. Hoshi Izumi 星泉 (2010). 14 世紀チベット語文献『王統明示鏡』における存在動詞. [Existential verbs in the Rgyal rabs gsal ba'i me long, a 14th century Tibetan narrative]. 東京大学言語学論集 Tokyo University Linguistic Papers 29(3). 29-68. Hoshi Izumi 星泉 (2016).『古典チベット語文法―『王統明鏡史』（14世紀）に基づいて』. Koten Chibettogo bunpō ― “ōtō meikyō-shi” (14 seiki) nimotozuite. A Grammar of Classical Tibetan based on The Clear Mirror: A Royal Genealogy (14th century). Tokyo: 東京外国語大学アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所. Tōkyō gaikokugo daigaku, Ajia Afurika gengo bunka kenkyūjo. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Hyslop, Gwendolyn (2011). A grammar of Kurtöp. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation. de Jong, Jan Willem (1989). The story of Rāma in Tibet: text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. Lustig, Anton (2010). A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa. Leiden: Brill. Matisoff, James A. (2003). Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press. Mattisoff, James 2017. “The so-called prefixes of Tibeto-Burman, and why they are so called.” Sociohistorical Linguistics in Southeast Asia: New Horizons for Tibeto-Burman Studies in honor of David Bradley. Picus Sizhi Ding and Jamin Pelkey, eds. Leiden: Brill. 13-32. Nishi Yoshio 西義 (1985). 「中国国内のチベット・ビルマ語系の言語見られる方向指示の動詞接辞」Chūgoku kokunai no Chibetto Biruma-go-kei no gengo mi rareru hōkō shiji no dōshi setsuji ["Directional verb prefixes as seen in the Tibetan-Burman languages of China"] 西田龍雄 Nishida Tatsuo『チベット・ビルマの諸語の言語数型学的研究』 Chibetto Biruma no shogo no gengo-sū-gata-gaku-teki kenkyū [Computational linguistic studies of Tibeto-Burman languages] 昭和59年度科学研究費補助金研究成果報告書 Shōwa 59-nendo kagakukenkyūhihojokin kenkyū seika hōkoku-sho [Outcome report for the grant-in-aid for scientific research for the year Showa 59] pp. 26-45. Oisel, Guillaume (2017). “On the origin of the Lhasa Tibetan evidentials song and byung,” Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages. Lauren Gawne and Nathan W. Hill, eds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 161–184. van Schaik, Sam (2011). “A new look at the source of the Tibetan script.” Imaeda, Yoshiro, Matthew T. Kapstein, and Tsuguhito Takeuchi, eds, New Studies of the Old Tibetan Documents: Philology, History and Religion. (Old Tibetan Documents Online Monograph Series 3.) Tokyo: Research Institute for Language and Cultures of Africa and Asia, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 45–96. Schuh, Dieter (2013). “Tibetischen Inschriften ins Maul geschaut: Beobachtungen zu Stein- und Felsinschriften sowie den Schriften des 7. bis 9. Jahrhunderts in Tibet.” Ehrhard, Franz-Karl and Maurer, Petra, (eds.), Nepalica-Tibetica: Festgabe for Christoph Cüppers. Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH, 143-184. Schwieger, Peter (2009). Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Second edition. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies. Snellgrove, David 1954. (review of Marcelle Lalou's) Manuel elementaire de tibétain classique. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 16.1: 198-199. Sprigg, Richard Keith (1987). “‘Rhinoglottophilia’ revisited: observations on ‘the mysterious connection between nasality and glottality.’” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10.1: 44-62. Takahashi, Yoshiharu (2001). “A descriptive study of Kinnauri (Pangi dialect): A preliminary report.” In Y. Nagano & R. J. LaPolla (Eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. 97-119. Takahashi, Yoshiharu (2007). “On the deictic patterns in Kinnauri (Pangi dialect).” In Roland Bielmeier and Felix Haller (eds.). Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 341-354. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Takahashi, Yoshiharu (2009) “On the Verbal Affixes in West Himalayan”. Issues in Tibeto-Burman Historical Linguistics, Yasuhiko Nagano, ed. special issue of Senri Ethnological Studies 75: 21–49. Takahashi, Yoshiharu (2012). "On a Middle Voice Suffix in Kinnauri (Pangi dialect) Yoshiharu". Objectivization and Subjectivization: A Typology of Voice Systems, Wataru Nakamura and Ritsuko Kikusawa, eds., special issue of Senri Ethnological Studies 77: 157–175. Tournadre, Nicolas (2010). “The Classical Tibetan cases and their transcategoriality: From sacred grammar to modern linguistics.” Himalayan Linguistics 9.2: 87-125. Turin, Mark (2012). A Grammar of Thangmi with an Ethnolinguistic Introduction to the Speakers and their Culture. Leiden: Brill. VanBik, Kenneth (2009). Proto-Kuki-Chin: a reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project, Dept. of Linguistics research unit in University of California, Berkeley. Wannemacher, Mark W. (1998). Aspects of Zaiwa Prosody. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics Wolfenden, Stuart N. (1929). Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Morphology. Royal Asiatic Society. Yabu Shirō 藪 司郎 (1982). アツィ語基礎語彙集 Atsigo kiso goishū / Classified dictionary of the Atsi or Zaiwa language (Sadon dialect) with Atsi, Japanese and English indexes. Tokyo: 東京外国語大学アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所 Tōkyō Gaikokugo Daigaku Ajia Afurika Gengo Bunka Kenkyūjo. Zadoks, Abel. 2000. Switch Evidence in Old Tibetan: between Switch Reference and Evidentiality. Paper presented at the 9th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Leiden University. Zadoks, Abel. 2002. The Tibetan Connection: Switch Evidence and direct-inverse marking from Old to Middle Tibetan. Paper presented at the 8th Himalayan Languages Symposium. Bern University.

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations