The Contribution of Tangut to Trans-Himalayan Comparative Linguistics

Hill, Nathan W.

Abstract

Tangut is among a handful of Trans-Himalayan1 languages with an early date of attestation and a vast literature. First recorded from 1042 C.E., Tangut is younger than Chinese (c. 1200 B.C.E) and Tibetan (650 C.E.), but older than Burmese (1113 C.E.). With the loss of the Tangut polity to the Mongols in 1227 C.E., the language gradually declined, with the most recent known text from 1499 C.E. The decipherment of Tangut became possible after Pyotr Kozlov excavated a sizable number of documents at Khara-Khoto in 1909 and transferred them to St Petersburg. The language and its literature are now reasonably well understood and actively researched. Nonetheless, the diachronic development of the language has garnered scant attention. The work under review treats the phonology and morphology of Tangut in comparative context. Jacques makes particular reference to Japhug Rgyalrong, a spoken language of our day. By any standard the methodological rigor and philological sophistication of this work is outstanding. The author has mastery over Tangut philology and its attendant secondary literature; written in French, the work consults research in Russian, Chinese, and Japanese. Tangut texts are cited at first hand and lucidly presented. In addition, Jacques brings his extensive fieldwork on Japhug Rgyalrong to bear throughout.

Citation

Hill, N. W. (2015). The Contribution of Tangut to Trans-Himalayan Comparative Linguistics. Archiv orientální, 83(1), 187-200

• Journal Article Type: Book Review
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2015
• Deposit Date: Jun 15, 2015
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 28, 2025
• Journal: Archiv orientální
• Print ISSN: 0044-8699
• Electronic ISSN: 2787-9461
• Peer Reviewed: Not Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 83
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 187-200
• Item Discussed: Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute
• Keywords: Tangut, phonology, Tibetan, Old Burmese, Trans-Himalayan, Tibeto-Burman, Sino-Tibetan
• Additional Information: References : Baxter, William H. (1992). A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Baxter, William H. and Laurent Sagart (2011). Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction (Version 1.00). Previously online at http://crlao.ehess.fr/document.php?id=1217. Bodman, Nicolas C. (1980). “Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: towards establishing the nature of the relationship.” Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Frans van Coetsem and Linda Waugh, (eds.). Leiden: Brill. pp. 34-199. Bradley, David (1979). Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press. Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Coblin, W. South (1987). “A Note on Old Tibetan Mu.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10.1: 166-168. Dài, Qìngxià 戴慶廈. 1990. 藏緬語族語言硏究 Zangmian yuzu yuyan yanjiu. Kunming: 雲南民族出版社 Yunanminzu chubanshe. van Driem, George (2014). “Trans-Himalayan.” Trans-Himalayan Linguistics. Thomas Owen-Smith and Nathan W. Hill, eds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 11-40. Gong Xun (2014). “The Personal Agreement System of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu Variety).” Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1: 44–60. Grossman, Eitan and Martin Haspelmath (2014). “The Leipzig-Jerusalem Transliteration of Coptic.” Egyptian-Coptic Linguistics in Typological Perspective. Eitan Grossman, Martin Haspelmath, and Tonio Sebastian Richter (eds.), 145-154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Hahn, Michael (1999). “Blags und Verwandtes (Miscellanea etymologica tibetica, VI).” Studia Tibetica et Mongolica (Festschrift Manfred Taube). Helmut Eimer et al. Eds. (Indica et Tibetica 34.) Swistall-Odendorft: Indica et Tibetica Verlag. 123-125. Handel, Zev (2008). “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2.3: 422–441. Hill, Nathan W. (2011). “An Inventory of Tibetan Sound Laws.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (Third Series) 21:4: 441-457. Hill, Nathan W. (2013a). “Three notes on Laufer's law.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36.1: 57-72. Hill, Nathan W. (2013b). “Relative order of Tibetan sound changes affecting laterals.” Language and Linguistics 14.1: 193-209. Hill, Nathan W. (2014a). “Some Tibetan verb forms that violate Dempsey’s law.” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 29: 91-101. Hill, Nathan W. (2014b). “Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese.” Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 43.2: 91-109. Imaeda, Yoshiro et al. (2007). Tibetan documents from Dunhuang: kept at the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the British Library: 65 texts in transliteration. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Jacques, Guillaume (2012). “A new transcription system for Old and Classical Tibetan.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 35.3: 89-96. Jacques, Guillaume (2014). “On Coblin’s law.” Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Richard VanNess Simmons and Newell Ann Van Auken, eds. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. 155–166. Jacques, Guillaume and Alexis Michaud (2011). “Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages” Diachronica 28.4: 1-25. Jäschke, Heinrich August (1881). A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Unger Brothers. Li Fanwen 李範文 (2008). 夏漢字典 Xia-Han zidian. Beijing: 中國社會科學出版社 Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe. Miyake, Marc Hideo (2012). “Complexity from Compression: a Sketch of Pre-Tangut”. Тангуты в Центральной Азии: сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: a collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov]. Irina Popova, ed. Moscow: Восточная литература. 244–261. Nishi, Yoshio (1999). Four Papers on Burmese: Toward the history of Burmese. Tokyo: Institute for the study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Schuessler, Axel (2009). Minimal Old Chinese and Later Han Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i press. Tsunoda, Tasaku (1985). “Remarks on Transitivity.” Journal of Linguistics 21.2: 385-339. Wun, Maung (1975). “Development of the Burmese language in the medieval period.” 大阪外国語大学学報 Ōsaka gaikokugo daigaku gakuhō 36: 63-119. Zhang Yisun (1985). Bod rgya tshig mdzod chen mo. Beijing: 民族出版社 Minzu chubanshe.