Sino-Tibetan: Part 2 Tibetan

Hill, Nathan W.

Sino-Tibetan: Part 2 Tibetan

Hill, Nathan W.

Authors

PROF Nathan Hill nh36@soas.ac.uk
Professor Tibetan&Historical Linguistics

Contributors

Rochelle Lieber
Editor

Pavol Štekauer
Editor

Citation

Hill, N. W. (2014). Sino-Tibetan: Part 2 Tibetan. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology (620-630). Oxford University Press

Publication Date	Jan 1, 2014
Deposit Date	Oct 7, 2014
Publicly Available Date	Mar 3, 2025
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Pages	620-630
Book Title	The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology
ISBN	9780199641642
Additional Information	References : Andersen, Paul Kent (1987). “Zero-anaphora and related phenomena in Classical Tibetan”. Studies in Language 11: 279-312. Beckwith, Christopher (1993). The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Beckwith, Christopher and Michael Walter (2010). "On the Meaning of Old Tibetan rje-blon during the Tibetan Empire Period." Journal Asiatique 298.2: 535-548. Beyer, Stephen (1992). The Classical Tibetan language. New York: State University of New York. Chang, Betty Shefts (1971). “The Tibetan Causative Phonology.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 42: 623-765. Conrady, August (1896). Eine indochinesische Causativ-Denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: O. Harrassowitz. Denwood, Philip (1986) "The Tibetan noun-final -s." Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 9.1: 97-101. Denwood, Philip (1999). Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. Downer, Gordon B. (1959). “Derivation by tone-change in Classical Chinese.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 22: 258-290. van Driem, George (1987). A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton. van Driem, George (2012). “The Trans-Himalayan phylum and its implications for population prehistory.” Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 5: 135-142. Geilich, Barbara (1994). Nasal-Suffigierung: Eine Studie zur vergleichenden Morphologie der indo-chinesischen Sprachen. Münster. Ostasiatisches Seminar. Gong Huang-cherng 龚煌成 (1977). "古藏文的y 及其相關問題 guzangwen de y ji qixiangguan wenti [Ancient Tibetan y and related questions]." Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 48.2 :205-228. (reprinted in) Gong Hwang-cherng 龔煌城 (2002). 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji / Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhong yang yan jiu yuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu: 379–399. Emmerick, R. E. (1983). “Some Leixcal Items from the Siddhasāra.” Contributions on Tibetan Language, History and Culture. Ernst Steinkellner and Helmut Tauscher, eds. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 10.) Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien. 61-68. Hahn, Michael (1997). "A propos the term gtsug-lag". Helmut Krasser, Michael T. Much, Ernst Steinkellner, Helmut Tauscher (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997. 341-348. Haller, Felix (2009). "Switch-reference in Tibetan." Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32.2: 45-106. Hill, Nathan W. (2009). “Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.” 語言暨語言學 Languages and Linguistics 10.1: 173-195. Hill, Nathan W. (2010a). A Lexicon of Tibetan Verb Stems as Reported by the Grammatical Tradition. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Hill, Nathan W. (2010b). “The converb -las in Old Tibetan.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 73.2: 245-260. Hill, Nathan W. (2010c). “An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology.” Transactions of the Philological Society 108.2: 110-125. Hill, Nathan W. (2011a). “An Inventory of Tibetan Sound Laws.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (Third Series) 21.4: 441-457. Hill, Nathan W. (2011b). “Alternances entre ḥ et b en tibétain ancien et dans les langues tibétaines modernes.” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 20: 115-122. Hill, Nathan W. (2012). “Tibetan -las, -nas, and -bas.” Cahiers de Linguistique—Asie Orientale 41.1: 3-38. Hill, Nathan W. (forthcoming). “A note on voicing alternation in the Tibetan verbal system.” Transactions of the Philological Society. Jacques, Guillaume (2001). "Les préfixes nominaux d- /g- en tibétain classique." Quinzième journée de linguistique - Asie orientale, EHESS, Paris, 08-06-2001. Jacques, Guillaume 向柏霖 (2003). 《嘉绒语、藏语及上古汉语的-s后缀》 [Le suffixe –s en Rgyalrong, en chinois archaïque et en tibétain], 民族语文 Minzu yuwen 1:12-15. Jacques, Guillaume 向柏霖 (2008). 嘉絨語研究 Jiarongyu yanjiu. [Study of the Rgyalrong Language]. 民族出版社Minzu Chubanshe. Jacques, Guillaume (2010). “A possible trace of verb agreement in Tibetan.” Himalayan Linguistics Journal 9.1: 41-49. Jacques, Guillaume (2012a). “Agreement Morphology: The Case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti.” Language and Linguistics 13.1: 83-116. Jacques, Guillaume (2012b). “An Internal Reconstruction of Tibetan Stem Alternations.” Transactions of the Philological Society 110.2: 212–224. Lalou, Marcelle (1953). "Tibétain ancien Bod/Bon." Journal Asiatique 241: 275-276. LaPolla, Randy J. (2003). “Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax.” The Sino-Tibetan. Languages. Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla, eds. London: Routledge, 22-42. LaPolla, Randy J. (2012). “Comments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics”. Language and Linguistics 13.1 :117-132. Lustig, Anton (2010). A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa. Leiden: Brill. Mei, Tsu-Lin 梅祖麟 (1980). “四聲別義中的時間層次 Si sheng bie yi zhong de shijian cencgci [chronological strata in derivation by tone change].” 中國語文 Zhongguo Yuwen 6.427-443. Mei, Tsu-Lin 梅祖麟 (2012). “The causative s- and nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan.” Language and Linguistics 13.1: 1-28. Meillet, Antoine (1925). La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & co. Nagano, Sadako (1994). "A note on the Tibetan kinship terms khu and zhang." Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17.2: 103-115. Nishida, Tatsuo (1994). “A personal view of the Sino-Tibetan Language Family.” Current issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Osaka: 26th international conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. 1-22. Plaisier, Heleen (2007). A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden: Brill. Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1973). “Some new hypotheses concerning word families in Chinese.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1.1: 111-125. Regamey, Constantin (1946/1947). "Considérations sur le système morphologique du tibétain littéraire." Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 6: 26-46. Robin, Francoise and Alice Vittrant (2007) "Reduplication dans les langues tibeto-birmanes: l'exemple du birman et du tibetain." Faits de langues 29: 77-98. Sagart, Laurent (1999). The Roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. Sagart, Laurent (2006). “On intransitive nasal prefixation in Sino-Tibetan languages.” Cahiers de linguistique - Asie orientale 35.1:57-70 Schuessler, Axel (1985). “The function of Qusheng in early Zhou Chinese.” Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: the state of the art. Graham Thurgood et al. Eds. 344-362. Pacific Linguistics series C-No.87. Canberra: The Australian National University. Schuessler, Axel (1998). "Another note on Old Tibetan rje-blas." Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 21.2: 3-4. Shafer, Robert (1938). “Prefixed m- in Tibetan.” Sino-Tibetica 3: 11-28. Snellgrove, David (1954). “Review of Marcelle Lalou’s Manuel elementaire de tibétain classique.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 16.1: 198-199. Tournadre, Nicolas (1996). L'ergativité en tibétain: approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Louvain: Peeters. Tournadre, Nicolas (2008). “Arguments against the Concept of ‘Conjunct’/‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan.” Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Brigitte Huber, et al., eds. Vol 1. Halle (Saale): International Institut for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies. 281–308. Uebach, Helga and Bettina Zeisler (2008): "rJe-blas, pha-los and Other Compounds with Suffix -s in Old Tibetan Texts." Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart und Paul Widmer (eds.) Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, vol 1. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies: 309-334. Uray, Géza (1952). "A Tibetan diminutive suffix." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2:182-220 Uray, Géza (1953a). “Some problems of the ancient Tibetan verbal morphology: methodological observations on recent studies.” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 37-62. Uray, Géza (1953b). "The suffix -e in Tibetan." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 3: 229-244. Uray, Géza (1955). "Duplication, gemination and triplication in Tibetan." Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 4.1-3: 177-256. Volkart, Marianne (2003). “Types of compounds in Written Tibetan.” Tej Ratna Kansakar & Mark Turin (eds.). Themes in Himalayan Languages. Heidelberg: South Asia Institute & Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University. 232-48 Wolfenden, Stuart N. (1928). "The Prefix m- with Certain Substantives in Tibetan." Language 4.4: 277-280. Wolfenden, Stuart N. (1929). Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Morphology. Royal Asiatic Society. Zadoks, Abel (2000). Switch Evidence in Old Tibetan: between Switch Reference and Evidentiality. Paper presented at the 9th Seminar of the IATS. Leiden University, The Netherlands. 24-30 June 2000. Zadoks, Abel (2002). The Tibetan Connection: Switch Reference and Evidentiality from Old Tibetan to Middle Tibetan. Paper presented at the 8th Himalayan Languages Symposium. Bern University, Switzerland. 19-22 September, 2002. Zhang Liansheng (1985). “The phonetic structure of ABCB type words in modern Lhasa Tibetan.” Soundings in Tibetan civilization. B.N. Aziz, M. Kapstein, eds. Delhi: Manohar. 20-34.