Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Operationalizing and Regulating Religious Freedom: Apostasy and Administrative "Reasonableness" in Malaysia and Beyond

Nelson, Matthew J.; Shah, Dian A. H.

Operationalizing and Regulating Religious Freedom: Apostasy and Administrative "Reasonableness" in Malaysia and Beyond Thumbnail


Authors

Dian A. H. Shah



Abstract

As a fundamental human right, religious freedom is commonly associated with the right to choose or change one’s religion (religious self-identification). We use the famous Malaysian case of Muslim-to-Christian convert Lina Joy to examine the operationalization of this freedom—not so much as a negative freedom constraining state power but as a fundamental right tied to administrative procedures underpinning state recognition. From a constitutional perspective, the balance between fundamental rights and administrative power is complex. The legal standards governing administrative procedures for religious conversion vary from country to country and, for our purposes, from state to state even within Malaysia’s federal order. Asking “when do such procedures become ‘unreasonable’ in ways that undermine core human rights protections,” we highlight the historical, constitutional, and political contexts within which Malaysian notions of administrative “reasonableness” unfold. The operationalization of religious freedom as a fundamental right, we argue, hinges on a deeply contextualized understanding of the political contingencies surrounding notions of administrative “reasonableness.”

Citation

Nelson, M. J., & Shah, D. A. H. (2018). Operationalizing and Regulating Religious Freedom: Apostasy and Administrative "Reasonableness" in Malaysia and Beyond. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 1293-1321. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy100

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 13, 2017
Online Publication Date Jan 21, 2019
Publication Date Oct 1, 2018
Deposit Date Jan 8, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jan 8, 2018
Journal International Journal of Constitutional Law
Print ISSN 1474-2640
Electronic ISSN 1474-2659
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 16
Issue 4
Pages 1293-1321
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy100

Files

nelson-shah-operationalizing-regulating-religious-freedom-ICON.pdf (444 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2019. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved. This is the accepted version of an article published by Oxford
University Press in International Journal of Constitutional Law: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy100





You might also like



Downloadable Citations