Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

From Foreign Text to Local Meaning: The Politics of Religious Exclusion in Transnational Constitutional Borrowing

Nelson, Matthew J.; Bâli, Aslı Ü.; Mednicoff, David; Lerner, Hanna

From Foreign Text to Local Meaning: The Politics of Religious Exclusion in Transnational Constitutional Borrowing Thumbnail


Authors

Aslı Ü. Bâli

David Mednicoff

Hanna Lerner



Abstract

Constitutional drafters often look to foreign constitutional models, ideas, and texts for inspiration; many are explicit about their foreign borrowing. However, when implemented domestically, the meaning of borrowed elements often changes. Political scientists and scholars of comparative constitutional law have analyzed the transnational movement of constitutional ideas and norms, but the political processes through which the meaning of foreign provisions might be refashioned remain understudied. Socio-legal scholars have examined the “transplantation” and “translation” of laws and legal institutions, but they rarely scrutinize this process in the context of constitutions. Drawing on an examination of borrowed constitutional elements in four cases (Pakistan, Morocco, Egypt, Israel), this article builds on research in comparative politics, comparative constitutional law, and socio-legal studies to provide a nuanced picture of deliberate efforts to import “inclusive” constitutional provisions regarding religion-state relations while, at the same time, refashioning the meaning of those provisions in ways that “exclude” specific forms of religious, sectarian, doctrinal, or ideological diversity. Building on socio-legal studies regarding the translation of law, we argue that foreign constitutional elements embraced by politically embedded actors are often treated as “empty signifiers” with meanings that are deliberately transformed. Tracing the processes that lead political actors to engage foreign constitutional elements, even if they have no intention of transplanting their prior meaning, we highlight the need for detailed case studies to reveal both the international and the national dynamics that shape and re-shape the meaning of constitutions today.

Citation

Nelson, M. J., Bâli, A. Ü., Mednicoff, D., & Lerner, H. (2020). From Foreign Text to Local Meaning: The Politics of Religious Exclusion in Transnational Constitutional Borrowing. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(4), 935-964. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.75

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 16, 2019
Online Publication Date Apr 14, 2020
Publication Date Apr 14, 2020
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2019
Publicly Available Date Nov 13, 2019
Journal Law and Social Inquiry
Print ISSN 0897-6546
Electronic ISSN 1747-4469
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 45
Issue 4
Pages 935-964
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.75
Keywords constitutions, constitution-making, constitutional borrowing, constitutional identity, Pakistan, Morocco, Egypt, Israel

Files

Nelson_From Foreign Text to Local Meaning.pdf (304 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in Law and Social Inquiry 10.1017/lsi.2019.75.
This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations