PROF Matthew Nelson mn6@soas.ac.uk
Professor of Politics
Indian Basic Structure Jurisprudence in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Reconfiguring the Constitutional Politics of Religion
Nelson, Matthew J.
Authors
Abstract
In both India and Pakistan, parliament is constitutionally endowed with ‘constituent power’, that is, the power to introduce constitutional amendments via procedures laid down in the constitution itself. Duly promulgated amendments, however, are occasionally struck down when Supreme Court judges see them as violating what the judges themselves define as the ‘essential features’ of each country’s constitutional ‘basic structure’. I trace the migration of basic structure jurisprudence from India to Pakistan, focusing on the ways in which it has elevated the power of judges over that of elected officials in the realm of religion-state relations. Specifically, I highlight the ways in which judicial independence vis-à-vis judicial appointments has been described as an essential feature of each country’s constitution, greatly enhancing the autonomous power of judges to mould constitutional benches that, in turn, define India’s constitutional understanding of secularism and Pakistan’s relationship with Islam.
Citation
Nelson, M. J. (2018). Indian Basic Structure Jurisprudence in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Reconfiguring the Constitutional Politics of Religion. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 13(2), 333-357. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.18
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 6, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 3, 2018 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jun 3, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 3, 2019 |
Journal | Asian Journal of Comparative Law |
Print ISSN | 2194-6078 |
Electronic ISSN | 1932-0205 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 333-357 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.18 |
Files
Nelson_Indian Basic Structure Jurisprudence in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.pdf
(277 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2018 National University of Singapore. This is the version of the article accepted for publication in Asian Journal of Comparative Law
published by Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.18
You might also like
What a Taliban theocracy means for Afghanistan
(2022)
Digital Artefact
Regime Types, Regime Transitions, and Religion in Pakistan
(2022)
Book Chapter
Islam and Intra/Inter-Religious Relations in Asia
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search