Strategic ignorance and interests in the UK Parliament: the case of Transatlantic African Trafficking and Chattel Enslavement

Crewe, Emma

Abstract

Elected UK mp s claim to represent our interests, for which they need to know our preferences within our social contexts, while peers in the House of Lords position themselves as knowledgeable experts. Parliaments are institutional knowledge producers and disseminators, but their knowledge will always be partial. Within parliamentary studies, far less attention has been given to this not knowing and the socio-political production and circulation of ignorance. Using the example of Transatlantic African Trafficking and Chattel Enslavement, I explore how and why different kinds of ignorance were promoted by the Westminster Parliament to sustain enslavement and, in contemporary times, to avoid reparations. Different processes of ignorance production were involved within which the distinction between structural and strategic ignorance aids our understanding of the power struggles that ensued in this history. It suggests that parliamentary scholars could usefully inquire into the range of different kinds of ignorance and disinformation as much as knowledge and expertise.

Citation

Crewe, E. (online). Strategic ignorance and interests in the UK Parliament: the case of Transatlantic African Trafficking and Chattel Enslavement. https://doi.org/10.1163/26668912-bja10104

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 17, 2025
• Online Publication Date: Apr 8, 2025
• Deposit Date: Apr 7, 2025
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 9, 2125
• Journal: International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
• Print ISSN: 26668904
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/26668912-bja10104
• Keywords: enslavement, ignorance in parliament, reparations
• Additional Information: References : Ahmed Sara. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Beatty, A. (2019). Emotional Worlds. Beyond an Anthropology of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Beckles, Hilary Mc D (2019). The Reparation Movement: Greatest Political Tide of the Twenty-first Century. Social and Economic Studies, 68(3/4), 11–30. Berg, Maxine and Hudson, Pat (2023). Slavery, Capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. London: Polity. Blackburn, Robert (1988). The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery. London, New York: Verso. Boaz, A., Davies, H., Fraser, A., and Nutley, S. (Eds.). (2019). What Works Now? Evidence Informed Policy and Practice. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo (2022) Racism with Racists. Colour-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Butler, Judith (2020). The Force of Non-Violence: the ethical in the political. London: Verso. Coates, Ta-Nehisi (2015) Between the World and Me. The Text Publishing Company: London. Crewe, E. (2017). Reading the Runes: Conflict, Culture and ‘Evidence’ in Law-making in the UK. Redescription: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 20(1), 32–48. Cusworth, H. (2024). Whose Emotions? Slavery & Abolition, 45(1), 171–186. Draper, Nicholas (2010). The Price of Emancipation: Slave-Ownership, Compensation and British Society at the End of Slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dumas, Paula E. S. (2012). Defending the Slave Trade and Slavery in Britain in the Era of Abolition, 1783-1833, PhD University of Edinburgh. Edenberg, E. and Hannon, M. (2021) Political Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fassin, Didier (2013). On Resentment and Ressentiment: The Politics and Ethics of Moral Emotions. Current Anthropology, 54(3), 249–267. Geddes, M. (2018). Committee Hearings of the UK Parliament: Who gives Evidence and does this Matter? Parliamentary Affairs, 71(2), 283–304. Geddes, M. (2020). Dramas at Westminster: Select committees and the quest for accountability. Manchester University Press. Geddes, M. (2021). The webs of belief around ‘evidence’ in legislatures: The case of select committees in the UK House of Commons. Public Administration, 99(1), 40–54. Gershon, I., & Raj, D. S. (2000). Introduction: the symbolic capital of ignorance. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 44(2), 3–14. Hall, Catherine, Draper, Nicholas, McClelland, Keith, Donington, Katie and Lang, Rachel (2014). Legacies of British Slave-ownership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Higman, Barry. W. (1967). The West India interest in Parliament 1807-33. Historical Studies, 13(49), 1-19. Huzzey, Richard (2018). Contesting Interests: Rethinking Pressure, Parliament, Nation, and Empire. Parliamentary History, 37: 1-17. Ingold, T. (2014)‘That’s Enough about Ethnography.’ Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4 (1), 383–395. Levy, L. (2023). The self-purchase of “freedom”, a reparative history of the abolition of Caribbean slavery, 1832–1833. Intellectual History Review, 34(4), 731–750. McClelland, Kevin (2014). ‘Redefining the West India interest: politics and the legacies of slave-ownership.’ In Catherine Hall, Nicholas Draper, Keith McClelland, Katie Donington and Rachel Lang. Legacies of British Slave-ownership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mullen, Stephen and Gibbs, Ewen. (2023) Scotland, Atlantic slavery and the Scottish National Party: From colonised to coloniser in the political imagination. Nations and Nationalism, 29(3), 922-938. Nurse, Angus. (2021) Reparations and Anti-Black Racism. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Patterson, Orlando (1982). Slavery and Social Death. A comparative study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Reddie, Richard (2007). Abolition! The Struggle to Abolish Slavery in the British Colonies. Oxford: Lion Hudson. Saward, Michael (2007). ‘The Representative Claim.’ Contemporary Political Theory, 5 (3), 297–318. Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl (2003). Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841–47. British Journal of Political Science. 33(4):581-605. Sheper-Hughes, N. 1993. Death Without Weeping. The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: California University Press. Taylor, Michael. (2016) British pro-slavery arguments and the bible, 1823-1833. Slavery and Abolition, 37(1): 139-158. Taylor, Michael (2020). The Interest. How the British Establishment Resisted the Abolition of Slavery. London: Penguin. Williams, Eric (1944). Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Koryzis, D., Dalas, A., Spiliotopoulos, D., & Fitsilis, F. (2021). ‘ParlTech: Transformation Framework for the Digital Parliament’. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(1), 15.