Eduardo Araral
Regulatory Constructivism: Application of Q Methodology in Italy and China
Araral, Eduardo; Asquer, Alberto; Wang, Yahua
Abstract
Conventional view holds that beliefs play an important role in the development of regulations but there is little evidence to support this claim. We use Comparative Q Methodology to systematically map out and compare the beliefs of public officers in China and Italy, two countries with contrasting sets of institutions but have both adopted similar ideas about integrated water resource management. We find some similarities and differences in the beliefs of public officers in both countries. In particular, we find that in both countries beliefs on the regulation of water utilities are diverse and fragmented on issues such as ownership structure of water utilities, how water infrastructure development should be funded, and how tariffs should be regulated. Our findings have two implications for theory, methods and practice. First, the Q methodology is a useful tool for systematically mapping out the beliefs of regulators and managers. Second, systematically mapping out beliefs will help facilitate the development of an alternative regime of regulation such as negotiated rule making. This alternative regime can provide substantial benefits such as more efficient rule making, more cost effective enforcement and compliance, and more equitable in terms of balancing the interests of stakeholders.
Citation
Araral, E., Asquer, A., & Wang, Y. (2016). Regulatory Constructivism: Application of Q Methodology in Italy and China. Water Resources Management, 31(8), 2497-2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1496-2
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 27, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 17, 2016 |
Publication Date | Sep 17, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Aug 31, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 31, 2016 |
Journal | Water Resources Management |
Print ISSN | 0920-4741 |
Electronic ISSN | 1573-1650 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 31 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 2497-2521 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1496-2 |
Files
Asquer_22868.pdf
(1.5 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
What a Bad Policy Idea! Exploring Views on Wind Farms in Italy
(2025)
Book Chapter
Editorial: Regulation and Governance of Gene Editing Technologies (CRISPR, etc.)
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About SOAS Research Online
Administrator e-mail: outputs@soas.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search